Krishna Kumar Indurkar v. State Of Chhattisgarh
NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR MCC No. 223 of 2020 • Krishna Kumar Indurkar S/o Nandlal Indurkar Aged About 54 Years Posted As Head Master, R/o Ambedkar Ward No. 9, Dongargarh, District Rajnandgaon Chhattisgarh ---- Petitioner
Versus
1. State of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, School Education Department Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan Naya Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh
2. Director Public Instruction Of Education Near Education Board Office Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh
3. The Secretary Finance Department, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan Naya Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh
4. Joint Director Education Division, Durg Infront Of Zila Panchayat, G.E. Road, Durg, District - Durg Chhattisgarh
5. Joint Director Treasury Account And Pension, Rajnandgaon, District Rajnandgaon Chhattisgarh
6. District Education Officer Rajnandgaon, District Rajnandgaon Chhattisgarh
7. Block Education Officer Rajnandgaon, District Rajnandgaon Chhattisgarh ---- Respondents For Applicant :
Shri Pawan Kesharwani, Advocate For Respondents/State :
Shri Avinash Singh, PL Hon'ble Shri Justice Goutam Bhaduri Order On Board 02/03/20
1. Heard.
2. The present MCC is filed for modification of the order dated 16.01.2020 passed
in WPS No.69 of 2020.
3. Learned counsel for the applicant would submit that in para 2 of the order dated 16.01.2020 passed in WPS No.69 of 2020 it is stated that the claim of the petitioner is based on the fact that the nature of duties discharged by them as Shiksha Karmis, whereas the petitioner was discharging the job of Assistant Teacher and presently working as Headmaster. Therefore, the word "Shiksha Karmis" at para 2 may be replaced with the word "Assistant Teacher". He would further submit that likewise in para 4 in the last line the word "she" may be replaced with "he".
4. Considering the factual aspect, it is observed that in order dated 16.01.2020 passed in WPS No.69 of 2020 at para 2 the word Shiksha Karmis be read as "Assistant Teacher" and in para 4 the word "she" should be read as "he". Rest of the order shall remain as it is.
5. With the aforesaid observation, the MCC stands disposed of. Sd/- Goutam Bhaduri Judge Ashu