Amit Kumar Bharti v. State Of Chhattisgarh

HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR WPS No. 1488 of 2020

1. Amit Kumar Bharti S/o Ramtahal Bharti Aged About 38 Years Working As Lecturer (L.B.) At Government Higher Secondary School Lahod, Block Baloda Bazar, District Baloda Bazar Bhatapara Chhattisgarh.

2. Chandan Das Baghel S/o Damodar Das Baghel Aged About 38 Years Working As Lecturer (L.B.) At Government Higher Secondary School Marda, Block Baloda Bazar, District Baloda Bazar Bhatapara Chhattisgarh.

3. Jagadish Kumar Sahu S/o Ghasiya Ram Sahu Aged About 37 Years Working As Lecturer (L.B.) At Government Higher Secondary School Damaru, Block Baloda Bazar, District Baloda Bazar Bhatapara Chhattisgarh.

4. Dinesh Kumar Sahu S/o Ramcharan Sahu Aged About 39 Years Working As Lecturer (L.B.) At Government Higher Secondary School Marda, Block Baloda Bazar, District Baloda Bazar Bhatapara Chhattisgarh.

5. Roopnarayan Sahu W/o Rameshwar Prasad Sahu Aged About 36 Years Working As Lecturer (L.B.) At Government Higher Secondary School Marda, Block Baloda Bazar, District Baloda Bazar Bhatapara Chhattisgarh.

6. Basant Kumar Sahu S/o Hemlal Sahu Aged About 40 Years Working As Lecturer (L.B.) At Government Higher Secondary School Lahod, Block Baloda Bazar, District Baloda Bazar Bhatapara Chhattisgarh.

7. Suman Lal Patel S/o Kanhaiya Lal Patel Aged About 47 Years Working As Lecturer (L.B.) At Government Higher Secondary School Lahod, Block Baloda Bazar, District Baloda Bazar Bhatapara Chhattisgarh.

8. Manohar Lal Sahu S/o Rameshwar Prasad Sahu Aged About 39 Years Working As Lecturer (L.B.) At Government Higher Secondary School Damaru, Block Baloda Bazar, District Baloda Bazar Bhatapara Chhattisgarh.

9. Rajesh Kumar Sahu S/o Bharat Lal Sahu Aged About 42 Years Working As Lecturer (L.B.) At Government Higher Secondary School Damaru, Block Baloda Bazar, District Baloda Bazar Bhatapara Chhattisgarh. 10.Girish Kumar Sahu S/o Bharat Lal Sahu Aged About 40 Years Working As Lecturer (L.B.) At Government Higher Secondary School Khajuri, Block Baloda Bazar, District Baloda Bazar Bhatapara Chhattisgarh. 11.Virendra Kumar Gendle S/o Mahettro Prasad Aged About 39 Years Working As Lecturer (L.B.) At Government Higher Secondary School Koyda, Block Baloda Bazar, District Baloda Bazar Bhatapara Chhattisgarh. 12.Yogesh Kumar Sahu S/o Dube Lal Sahu Aged About 36 Years Working As Lecturer (L.B.) At Government High School Dongra, Block Baloda Bazar, District Baloda Bazar Bhatapara Chhattisgarh. ---- Petitioners

Versus

1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Department Of School

Education, Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantralaya, Naya Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh.

2. Secretary Department Of Panchayat And Rural Development, Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantralaya, Naya Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh.

3. Commissioner Cum Director Directorate Of Panchayat, Atal Nagar New Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh

4. Chief Executive Officer Zila Panchayat Baloda Bazar Bhatapara, District Baloda Bazar Bhatapara Chhattisgarh.

5. District Education Officer District Baloda Bazar Bhatapara Chhattisgarh.

6. Block Education Officer Baloda Bazar, District Baloda Bazar Bhatapara Chhattisgarh ---- Respondents For Petitioners :

Shri Govind Dewangan, Advocate.

For State :

Shri Avinash Singh, PL.

Hon'ble Shri Justice Goutam Bhaduri Order On Board 04/03/2020 Heard.

1.

The limited grievance which the petitioners have raised in this writ petition is that by virtue of order passed in WPS No.2530 of 2017 (Mukesh Kumar Patel and another Vs. State of Chhattisgarh and another) decided on 26.11.2017 the petitioners have been granted the benefit of revised pay scale on completion of 8 years of service.

2.

Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the grievance which now remains is that the benefit is being provided to the petitioners prospectively and though the respondents have made a calculation which the petitioners were entitled from the date of their completion of 8 years but no effective orders have been passed nor has department taken any steps for release of the arrears of payment. The petitioners pray for appropriate direction to the respondents for

releasing the said amount.

3.

Without entering into the merits of the case and taking into consideration the judgment of this Court in the case of Mukesh Patel (supra) which has also been affirmed by the Division Bench and taking note of the fact that the respondents have complied with the order to the extent of granting revised pay scale to the petitioner, let respondents no. 2 to 4 take an appropriate decision at the earliest so far as release of the arrears of payment which the petitioners are entitled for. Expecting a decision from the respondents within a period of 90 days from the date of receipt of copy of this order the present writ petition stands disposed off. Sd/- Goutam Bhaduri Judge gouri