High Court Of ChhattisgarhWPS/1585/2017disposed off

Yashwant Sahu v. State Of Chhattisgarh

2017-04-03Hon'Ble Shri Justice Prashant Kumar Mishra2 pages

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR WPS No. 1585 of 2017 • Yashwant Sahu S/o. Shri Ram Bilash Sahu, Aged About 62 Years R/o. Sanjay Nagar, Lakholi, Police Station City Kotwali, Rajnandgaon, Tahsil & Distt. Rajnandgaon (Chhattisgarh) ---- Petitioner

Versus

1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through Its Secretary, Department Of Home/ Police, Secretariat, Mahanadi Bhawan, New Raipur, P. S. And Post Rakhi District Raipur (Chhattisgarh)

2. Director General Of Police ( D G P), Police Headquarter ( P H Q), Near Mahanadi Bhawan, P S & Post Rakhi, New Raipur, District Raipur (Chhattisgarh)

3. Assistant Inspector General Of Police ( A I G P) (Personnel/ Administration) Police Headquarter ( P H Q), Near Mahanadi Bhawan, P. S. And Post Rakhi, New Raipur, District Raipur (Chhattisgarh)

4. Superintendent Of Police ( S. P.), Police Training School ( P. T. S.), Mana, Tahsil Dharsinwa, Police Station Mana, District Raipur (Chhattisgarh) ---- Respondent For Petitioner Mr. Abhishek Pandey, Advocate For Respondent/State Mr. Shashank Thakur, Govt. Advocate Hon'ble Shri Justice Prashant Kumar Mishra Order On Board 3/4/2017

1. Heard.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that earlier the petitioner was working as Driver in the MPSRTC and thereafter,

in the CIDC. In due course, the petitioner was absorbed in the Department of Home, Police Establishment, where he is working as Driver since 2003, however, he has not been paid one month's additional salary, which a Driver in the Police Establishment is entitled for under the Circular dated 12.9.1979 (Annexure P/5).

3. Considering the nature of dispute brought before this Court, the petition is disposed of with direction that in the event, the petitioner prefers a representation before the competent authority for grant of one month's additional salary in view of the Circular dated 12.09.1975 within a period of one month from today, the competent authority shall decide the representation by a speaking order, at the earliest, preferably within a period of 04 months.

Sd/- Judge (Prashant Kumar Mishra) Shyna