Shilpa Pusatkar v. State Of Chhattisgarh

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR WPS No. 1801 of 2017 • Shilpa Pusatkar W/o Shri Subhash Pusatkar, Aged About 38 Years R/o Ward No. 14, Mahatma Gandhi Ward, Nagar Panchayat Arjunda, Tahsil Gunderdehi, District Durg (Chhattisgarh). ---- Petitioner

Versus

1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through : The Secretary, Panchayat & Rural Welfare Department, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, New Raipur, District Raipur (Chhattisgarh).

2. Chief Executive OfÏcer, District Panchayat Durg, District Durg (Chhattisgarh).

3. Block Education OfÏcer, Doundilohara, District Durg (Chhattisgarh).

---- Respondent For Petitioner Mr. Gautam Khetrapal, Advocate For Respondent/State Ms. Tripti Rao, Panel Lawyer Hon'ble Shri Justice Prashant Kumar Mishra Order On Board 9/5/2017

1. Heard.

2. The petitioner is claiming benefit of two advance increments in view of the State Government's Circular dated 02.11.2011 (Annexure P/1) on the ground that the petitioner has only one child, therefore, he is entitled for such increments.

3. Bare perusal of the said Circular would indicate that an

employee is entitled to two advance increments if after birth of one child, the husband or wife undergoes sterilization operation and if the husband or wife undergoes such operation after having two children, he will be entitled to one increment.

4. In case of the petitioner, he has adopted one child, but not undergone any sterilization operation, therefore, the prerequisites of the Circular has not been satisfied and as such, the petitioner is not entitled for any benefit of the Circular.

5. Consequently, the writ petition has no substance and the same deserves to be and is dismissed.

Sd/- Judge (Prashant Kumar Mishra) Shyna