← Library
High Court Of ChhattisgarhMCC/307/2017allowed

Jasvir Singh Gurudatta v. The Sanchalak Lok Shikshan Chhattisgarh

2017-04-25Hon'Ble Shri Justice Prashant Kumar Mishra2 pages

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR MCC No. 307 of 2017

1. Jasvir Singh Gurudatta S/o Baldeo Singh Gurudatta, Aged About 58 Years Removed Upper Division Teacher, Mahasamund, Present Address Mahasamund, Collectorate Road, In Front Of State Bank Of India Bhawan Mahasamund, Civil And Revenue District Mahasamund (Chhattisgarh) ---- Petitioner

Versus

1. The Sanchalak Lok Shikshan Chhattisgarh Directorate Rajdhani Raipur Civil And Revenue District Raipur (Chhattisgarh)

2. The District Education Officer, Mahasamund District Mahasamund (Chhattisgarh)

3. The State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary School Education Department Mahanadi Bhawan, New Mantralaya, Naya Raipur, District Raipur (Chhattisgarh)

4. The Collector Mahasamund, District Mahasamund (Chhattisgarh)

5. The Deputy Director, Lok Shikshan Directorate Rajdhani, Raipur, District Raipur (Chhattisgarh)

6. The Sahayak Sanchalak (School Education) Department, Mahasamund, District Mahasamund (Chhattisgarh)

7. The Principal Govt. Higher Secondary School Mahasamund, District Mahasamund (Chhattisgarh)

8. The Union Of India Through The Secretary Education Department, New Delhi ---- Respondent For Petitioner Shri J.R. Verma, Advocate For Respondent/State Ms. Sunita Jain, Panel Lawyer Hon'ble Shri Justice Prashant Kumar Mishra Order On Board 25/04/2017

MCC No.307 of 2017 1.

By this MCC, the applicant has prayed for restoration of MCC No.871 of 2015 as well as WPS No.2253 of 2015, however, he has paid only one set of Court fees.

2.

At this stage, learned counsel for the applicant would submit that he would affix the additional Court fee during the course of the day. 3.

As prayed, learned counsel for the applicant is permitted to affix the additional Court fee and the Reader of the Court is directed to cancel the Court fees.

I.A.No.1 4.

This is an application for condonation of delay in filing the MCC No.307 of 2017.

5.

In view of the order passed by this Court in MCC No.591 of 2016 the delay in filing the MCC is condoned.

6.

On due consideration, despite dismissal of MCC No.871 of 2015, WPS No.2253 of 2015, which was treated to be dismissed for want of noncompliance of Court order, is restored to its original number. 7.

A copy of this order be placed in the record of WPS No.2253 of 2015. Sd/- Judge Prashant Kumar Mishra Gowri