← Library
High Court Of ChhattisgarhWPS/1851/2017disposed off

Radheshyam Chandrakar v. Chhattisgarh Rajya Gramin Bank

2017-04-20Hon'Ble Shri Justice Prashant Kumar Mishra2 pages

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR WPS No. 1851 of 2017 • Radheshyam Chandrakar S/o Late Pyarelal Chandrakar, Aged About 58 Years R/o Shankar Nagar, Mahasamund, District Mahasamund (Chhattisgarh).

---- Petitioner

Versus

1. Chhattisgarh Rajya Gramin Bank A Joint Venture Of Government Of India, State Government And S B I Through Its Chairman Chhattisgarh Rajya Gramin Bank, Head Office Mahadev Ghat Road, Sundernagar Raipur, District Raipur (Chhattisgarh).

2. Chairman, Chhattisgarh Rajya Gramin Bank, Head Office Mahadev Ghat Road, Sundernagar Raipur, District Raipur (Chhattisgarh).

3. General Manager ( Administration )/ Disciplinary Authority, Chhattisgarh Rajya Gramin Bank, Head Office Mahadev Ghat Road, Sundernagar Raipur, District Raipur (Chhattisgarh).

---- Respondents For Petitioner :

Shri Manoj Paranjpe, Advocate For Respondent No.

:

Shri NN Roy, Advocate Hon'ble Shri Justice Prashant Kumar Mishra Order On Board 20/04/2017

1. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that as against order dated 11.08.2015 imposing punishment of stoppage of two increments without cumulative effect and reduction in pay-scale by two stages, the petitioner has preferred an appeal before the appellate authority on 02.03.2016 in terms of the Chhattisgarh Rajya Gramin Bank Regulations, 2013, yet the appeal has not been considered and decided despite lapse of more than a year.

2. Considering the entire facts situation of the case, the writ petition is disposed of with direction that the appellate authority shall consider and decide petitioner's representation at the earliest, preferably within a period of three months from the date of submission of certified copy of this order.

3. It is made clear that this Court has not expressed any opinion on the merits of the case and the respondent authorities shall decide the matter, on its own merits, strictly in accordance with law, without treating any observation made in this order, as opinion on the merits of the case. Sd/- Judge Prashant Kumar Mishra Ashu