Vijay Kumar Yadav v. Food Corporation Of India And ORS.

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR WPS No. 2006 of 2015 • Virendra Kumar Nai S/o Late Girvar Lal Nai Aged About 33 Years R/o Shikshak Colony, Tilda, Ward No. 5 Raipur, Police Station- Tilda, Raipur, Distt. Raipur (Chhattisgarh)

Versus

1. Food Corporation Of India Through Its Managing Director, Head Office, Food Corporation Of India, New Delhi- 110001. WPS No. 2007 Of 2015 • Vijay Kumar Yadav S/o Late Shri Gokul Prasad Yadav Aged About 32 Years R/o Old Station Para, Ward No. 4, Bagbahara, P.S.- Bagbahara, Civil & Revenue Distt. Mahasamund (Chhattisgarh)

1. Food Corporation Of India Through Its Managing Director, Head Office, Food Corporation Of India, New Delhi- 110001. WPS No. 2010 Of 2015

• Ajeet Swami S/o Late Jee Ravi Swami Aged About 34 Years R/o Pension Bada, Viveka Nanda Nagar, Anshu Behind Pan Palace, P.S.- Raipur, Civil & Revenue Distt. Raipur (Chhattisgarh)

1. Food Corporation Of India Through Its Managing Director, Head Office, Food Corporation Of India, New Delhi- 110001. WPS No. 2009 Of 2015 • Mahesh Kumar Nishad S/o . Late Shri Kishan Lal Nishad Aged About 33 Years R/o. Mohabhattapara, Ward No. 11, Village Nevra Tilda, P.S. Tilda, District RJaipur, Civil And Revenue District Raipur (Chhattisgarh)

1. Food Corporation Of India Through Its Managing Director, Head Office, Food Corporation Of India, New Delhi- 110001. ---- Respondent And WPS No. 2008 Of 2015 • Christopher George Louise S/o Late Lawrance Louise Aged About 31 Years R/o Opp. Holy Cross Higher Secondary School, Pensionbada, P.S.- City Kotwali, Raipur, Civil &

Revenue Distt. Raipur (Chhattisgarh)

1. Food Corporation Of India And Ors. Through Its Managing Director, Head Office, Food Corporation Of India, New Delhi110001. For Petitioner :

Mr. Awadh Tripathi, Advocate.

For Respondents : Mr. Prashant Jaiswal, Senior Advocate assisted by Mr. Himanshu Sinha, Advocate.

Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal Order On Board 30/11/2015 (1) All these petitions involve common facts and common question of law and, as such, require consideration and disposal by the common order.

(2) Learned Senior Counsel appearing for the respondents would submit that Food Corporation of India has taken a decision to reconsider the case of the petitioners on merits and pass a speaking & reasoned orders after reconsideration. (3) In view of the aforesaid submissions, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that this petition may be disposed of directing the respondents to reconsider the case of the petitioner

on merits and pass speaking & reasoned orders expeditiously. (4) In view of submissions of the parties, the writ petition are accordingly finally disposed of. However, it is directed the Food Corporation of India shall re-consider the petitioners' case expeditiously and communicate the result of consideration within 10 weeks from today to the petitioners.

Sd/- (Sanjay K. Agrawal) Judge D/-