Vijay Sahu v. State Of Chhattisgarh
NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR WPS No. 1969 of 2017 • Vijay Sahu S/o Mohan Lal Sahu, Aged About 26 Years R/o Dalganjan Dafai Chota Bazar, Chirmiri, District Korba (Chhattisgarh).
Versus
And WPS No. 1975 Of 2017 • Satish Chandrakar S/o Ramsvarup Chandrakar, Aged About 28 Years R/o Village Kusmuli, Post Matsagra, Tehsil Kota, Bilaspur (Chhattisgarh).
And WPS No. 1973 Of 2017 • Vijay Kumar Singh S/o Shri Laxman Singh, Aged About 34 Years R/o 92/2 A Kharmora Ward No. 31, Post Dadarkhura, Korba (Chhattisgarh). And WPS No. 1974 Of 2017 • Seema Dewangan S/o Shri Kaleshawer Prasad Dewangan, Aged About 30 Years R/o L I G - 182, Ronu Niwas C/o Mr. Soloman, Shivaji Nagar, Korba And
WPS No. 1970 Of 2017 • Naresh Kumar Singh S/o Vishnu Charan Singh, Aged About 27 Years R/o Gandhi Nagar, Ratanpur, Ratanpur, Bilaspur (Chhattisgarh). For Petitioners :
Shri Mateen Siddiqui , Advocate For Respondents-State :
Shri Arvind Dubey, Ms. Sunita Jain and Shri Rajendra Tripathi, Panel Lawyers For Respondent/ :
Shri Jitendra Shrivastava, Advocate District Cooperative Central Bank Hon'ble Shri Justice Prashant Kumar Mishra Order On Board 26/04/2017
1. After arguing for sometime, learned counsel for the petitioners, seeks permission of this Court to withdraw these petitions with liberty to move duly constituted dispute before the jurisdictional Registrar under Section 55(2) of the C.G. Cooperative Societies Act, 1960.
2. Learned State counsel would inform that as per the Notification issued by the Registrar, the term "Registrar" occurring in Section 55(2) would include the office of Joint Registrar or Deputy Registrar.
3. Since the petitioners have been bonafidely litigating before this Court and
thereafter, before the State Cooperative Tribunal, upon grant of liberty by this Court, if the petitioners raise dispute under Section 55(2), the concerned Registrar shall entertain the dispute on merits without raising the plea of limitation.
4. Accordingly, the writ petitions are dismissed, as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty granted in favour of the petitioners.
5. The petitioners apprehend that the order of termination passed against the petitioners having its genesis in the enquiry report submitted by a team of Registrars, which in turn includes Additional Registrar or Joint Registrar, the persons, who were involved in the process of earlier enquiry, may not adjudicate the dispute with an open mind.
6. If the jurisdictional Deputy Registrar, before whom, the dispute would be raised by the petitioners pursuant to the termination order, was in any manner a party to the earlier enquiry, the petitioner would be at liberty to move an application before the Registrar, Cooperative Societies, Chhattisgarh for transferring the dispute to any other Deputy Registrar or Joint Registrar in the State, who was not party to the earlier enquiry.
7. In such eventuality, the Registrar, Cooperative Societies, Chhattisgarh, shall pass necessary orders to transfer the dispute to any other Deputy Registrar or Joint Registrar, who was not a party in the earlier enquiry. Sd/- Judge Prashant Kumar Mishra Ashu