Anjli Sahu v. State Of Chhattisgarh

-1NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 1536 of 2019

1. Anjli Sahu D/o Shri R. K. Sahu Aged About 31 Years Guest Faculty Commerce, Govt. Laxmaneshwar College Kharod District- JanjgirChampa, Chhattisgarh, R/o I.G. Rest House Road Janjgir, DistrictJanjgir-Champa, Chhattisgarh.

2. Durga Aditya D/o Shri Itwari Aditya Aged About 32 Years Guest Faculty English, Govt. Laxmaneshwar College Kharod DistrictJanjgir-Champa, Chhattisgarh, R/o Kera Chowk, Bhoghapara, Ward No.11, Post-Shvrinarayan, District- Janjgir-Champa, Chhattisgarh.

3. Ragini Maravi D/o Shri B.S. Maravi Aged About 24 Years Occupation Guest Faculty Physics Govt. Laxmaneshwar College Kharod DistrictJanjgir-Champa, Chhattisgarh, R/o Village Shivpur Post-Silli DistrictKorba, Chhattisgarh.

4. Harichand Yadav S/o Shri Kartika Ram Yadav Aged About 28 Years Occupation Guest Faculty Political Science Govt. Laxmaneshwar College Kharod, District- Janjgir-Champa, Chhattisgarh, R/o H. No. 29, Village Motipur Post- Amakhoha Tehsil Kasdol DistrictBalodabazar-Bhatapara, Chhattisgarh ---- Petitioners

Versus

1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through Principal Secretary, Higher Education Department, Mantralaya, Indravati Bhawan, New Raipur, DistrictRaipur, Chhattisgarh.

2. Commissioner Higher Education, Block C- 3, 2rd And 3rd Floor, Indravati Bhawan, New Raipur, District- Raipur, Chhattisgarh

3. Principal Govt. Laxmaneshwar College Kharod, District- JanjgirChampa, Chhattisgarh. ---Respondents For Petitioners :

Mr. Chandradeep Prasad, Advocate For State :

Mr. Arvind Dubey, Panel Lawyer Mr. Sameer Behar, Panel Lawyer Hon'ble Shri Justice P. Sam Koshy Order on Board 06/03/2019

1. The present writ petitions have been filed in February, 2019. The petitioners have challenged the decisions of the State Government dated 01.07.2017 and 31.07.2013.

-22. Perusal of the record would show that in the recruitment process, which were initiated in the year 2018, the petitioners have without any objection participated and have also been found selected and each of the petitioners have also been granted appointment and the petitioners have also resumed their duties.

3. Given the facts, that the petitioners have participated in the recruitment process and on being selected have joined the services, nothing further remains to be adjudicated in the present writ petition. As far as the dispute so far as the remunerations, which the petitioners are seeking, it appears that the petitioners have till date not made any representation to the higher authorities in the Department for redressal of their grievances. The writ petitions, therefore, stand disposed of with a direction to the petitioners to make a suitable representation to the respondents supported with all relevant records in support of their contentions and the respondents in turn shall decide the same in accordance with rules and regulations governing the field.

4. With the aforesaid observations, the writ petitions stand disposed off. Sd/- (P. Sam Koshy) Judge Ved