← Library
High Court Of ChhattisgarhWPC/598/2018disposed off

Sukalu Ram Sahu v. State Of Chhattisgarh

2018-03-06Hon'Ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal2 pages

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR WPC No. 598 of 2018 Sukalu Ram Sahu S/o Late Shri Devlal Sahu, Aged About 66 Years R/o Village Bhudgahan, P.O. Bhadhera, P.S. Suhela, Tahsil Simga, District Baloda Bazar Bhatapara, Chhattisgarh., District : Balodabazar-Bhathapara, Chhattisgarh ---- Petitioner

Versus

1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through Its Secretary, Panchayat And Rural Development Department, Mahanadi Bhavan, Capital Complex, New Mantralaya, Village Rakhi, District Raipur Chhattisgarh., District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh

2. Collector, District Baloda Bazar- Bhatapara Chhattisgarh., District : Balodabazar-Bhathapara, Chhattisgarh

3. Sub Divisional Officer, Simga, District Baloda Bazar Bhatapara Chhattisgarh., District : Balodabazar-Bhathapara, Chhattisgarh

4. Maneshweri Bai W/o Shri Santosh Kumar Sahu, Sarpanch Of Gram Panchayat Bhudgahan, Vikashkhand Simga, R/o Village Budgahan, P.S. Suhela, Tahsil Simga, District Baloda Bazar Bhatapara Chhattisgarh., District : Balodabazar-Bhathapara, Chhattisgarh

5. Lekhram, S/o Ghasia Vishwakarma, Aged About 52 Years R/o Village Budgahan, P.S. Suhela, Tahsil Simga, District Baloda Bazar Bhatapara Chhattisgarh., District : Balodabazar-Bhathapara, Chhattisgarh

6. Pardeshi Ram S/o Shri Dharmu Dhritlahare, Aged About 71 Years R/o Village Budgahan, P.S. Suhela, Tahsil Simga, District Baloda Bazar Bhatapara Chhattisgarh., District : Balodabazar-Bhathapara, Chhattisgarh

7. Shyam Das S/o Shri Girdhar Boudh, Aged About 89 Years R/o Village Budgahan, P.S. Suhela, Tahsil Simga, District Baloda Bazar Bhatapara Chhattisgarh., District : Balodabazar-Bhathapara, Chhattisgarh ---- Respondents For Petitioner :

Mr. Yogesh Pandey, Advocate.

For State :

Mr. R. N. Pusty, G.A.

Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal Order On Board

06/03/18 1.

Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would submit that on petitioner's complaint proceeding under Section 40 of the Panchayat Raj Adhiniyam, 1996 initiated against respondent No. 4 is pending consideration before respondent No. 3 - Sub Divisional Officer, Simga since 29.05.2017 and has not been decided till date.

2.

I have heard learned counsel for the petitioner. 3.

Be that as it may, the respondent No. 3- Sub Divisional Officer, Simga is directed to consider and dispose of the said proceedings initiated against respondent No. 4 expeditiously without any further delay. 4.

With the aforesaid observation, the writ petition finally stands disposed of. No order as to cost(s).

Sd/- (Sanjay K. Agrawal) Judge Priyanka