High Court Of ChhattisgarhWPS/1527/2019disposed off

Santosh Kumar Soni v. State Of Chhattisgarh

2019-03-06Hon'Ble Shri Justice P. Sam Koshy2 pages

-1NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 1527 of 2019 Santosh Kumar Soni S/o Late Shri Punaram Soni Aged About 61 Years R/o Street No.5, Vivekanand Aashram, Mangal Bazar, Raipur, Police Station Azad Chowk, Tahsil And District- Raipur, Chhattisgarh. ---- Petitioner

Versus

1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through Its Secretary, Co-Operative Department, Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantralaya Police Station And Post- Rakhi, Atal Nagar, Raipur, District- Raipur, Chhattisgarh.

2. Managing Director Chhattisgarh State Co-Operative Milk Federation Limited, Urla, District- Durg, Chhattisgarh.

3. Deputy General Manager (Personnel And Administration) Chhattisgarh State Cooperative Milk Federation Limited, Urla District Durg, Chhattisgarh.

4. Deputy General Manager (Finance) Chhattisgarh State Cooperative Milk Federation Limited, Urla, District- Durg, Chhattisgarh. ---Respondents For Petitioner :

Mr. Santosh Kumar Pandey, Advocate Mr. Abhishek Pandey, Advocate For State :

Ms. Astha Shukla, Panel Lawyer Hon'ble Shri Justice P. Sam Koshy Order on Board 06/03/2019

1. The limited grievance, which the petitioner has raised in the present writ petition is that the petitioner has superannuated on attaining the age of retirement w.e.f. 31.07.2018 and though he has retired in July, 2018, till date the respondents have not released the leave encashment amount payable to the petitioner, so also the medical claim and his T.A. has also not been released.

2. According to the petitioner, so far as his earned leave is concerned, the respondents have already taken a decision as early as on

-230.07.2018 (Annexure P/2) for releasing the same, but till date he has not received it.

3. Given the limited grievance, which the petitioner has raised, this Court is of the opinion that no fruitful purpose would be served in keeping the writ petition pending by admitting the same, rather ends of justice would serve if the writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondents No.2 to 4 to immediately process the claim of the petitioner and whatever due that are payable to the petitioner on his retirement including the earned leave, medical claim and T.A. etc., the same should be finalized within an outer limit of 3 months from the date of receipt of the copy of this order.

4. It shall be the responsibility of the petitioner to appraise the respondents No.2 to 4, so far as the order passed by this Court is concerned.

5. With the aforesaid observations, the writ petition stands disposed off. Sd/- (P. Sam Koshy) Judge Ved