← Library
High Court Of ChhattisgarhWPS/2093/2018disposed off

Jagdev Kunjam v. State Of Chhattisgrh

2018-03-07Hon'Ble Shri Justice Manindra Mohan Shrivastava2 pages

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR WPS No. 2093 of 2018

1. Jagdev Kunjam S/o Shri Sukhram Kunjam, Aged About 35 Years Assistant Teacher (Panchayat), Govt. Primary School Bandhapara Domarpani, District Kanker Chhattisgarh., District : Kanker, Chhattisgarh

2. Chandrika Prasad Sahu, S/o Late Fulchand Sahu, Aged About 41 Years Assistant Teacher (Panchayat), Govt. Primary School Jhipatola, District Kanker Chhattisgarh., District : Kanker, Chhattisgarh

3. Papu Ram Sinha, S/o Shri Rambhrosa Sinha, Aged About 41 Years Assistant Teacher (Panchayat), Govt. Primary School Kanapod, District Kanker Chhattisgarh., District : Kanker, Chhattisgarh

4. Manbodh Ram Sahu, S/o Shri Kartik Ram Sahu, Aged About 38 Years Assistant Teacher (Panchayat), Govt. Primary School Charbhatti, District Kanker Chhattisgarh., District : Kanker, Chhattisgarh ---- Petitioners

Versus

1. State Of Chhattisgrh Through The Secretary, Panchayat And Rural Development Department, Mahanadi Bhawan, New Raipur Chhattisgarh., District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh

2. Chief Executive Officer, Zila Panchayat, Kanker, District Kanker Chhattisgarh., District : Kanker, Chhattisgarh

3. Chief Executive Officer, Janpad Panchayat, Charama, District Kanker Chhattisgarh., District : Kanker, Chhattisgarh

4. Chief Executive Officer, Janpad Panchayat, Narharpur, District Kanker Chhattisgarh., District : Kanker, Chhattisgarh --Respondents For Petitioners :

Mr. Somkant Verma, Advocate For State :

Mr. Satish Gupta, G.A.

Hon'ble Shri Justice Manindra Mohan Shrivastava Order On Board 07.03.2018 Heard.

1.

Learned counsel for the parties would submit that the issue raised in this petition is

squarely covered by order dated 28.11.2017 passed by this Court in WPS No.2530 of 2017 (Mukesh Kumar Patel and another Vs. State of Chhattisgarh and another) and batch of petitions wherein the circular dated 23.04.2016 has been quashed, petitions allowed and it has been declared that the petitioners therein shall be entitled to obtain the benefit of revised pay-scale on completion of 8 years service by including the services rendered by them on a lower post or on the same post.

2.

In view of the aforesaid submission and the impugned order and action is based on circular dated 23.04.2016 which has been quashed in the case referred to herein above, the petition also deserves to be allowed with the direction that the petitioners shall be entitled to obtain the benefit of revised pay-scale on completion of 8 years service by including the services rendered by them on a lower post or on the same post. 3.

No order as to costs.

Sd/- (Manindra Mohan Shrivastava) Judge Rekha