← Library
High Court Of ChhattisgarhWP/375/2003dismissed

Hji-Prop-Gmmco Ltd. v. Union Bank Of India And ORS.

2016-10-21Hon'Ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal2 pages

^m ^

IN THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR

WRIT PETITION N0. 376; OF 2003 ^^ HJI-PROP- GMMCO LIMITED Post Office - Ainlai Paper Mills, District - SHAHDOL (MP) 484 117 A Company incorporated under the Provisions ofthe Companies Act, 1956 Having it's Registered Office at, Birla Building, 14th Floor, 9/1, R.N. Mukherjee Road, KOLKATTA 700 001 ...PETITIONER -VERSUSp.^ ^v^,,^^w^^ 5^":^'

.,^^^-- Union Bank oflndia, A Body Corporate constituted Under the Banking Companies (Acquisition & Transfer ofUndertakings) Act, 1970, and having it's Branch Office lcnown as Samata Colony Branch^ RAJPUR (CG) 492 001 Ip State Bank oflndia, A statutory body having it's Branch Office known as / Commercial Branch at ^ 24, Park Street, KOLKATTA 700 016 2./^^-7 / Shadija Petrochemicals Limited, A Public Company having it9s Office at 26, Ashirwad Towers, G.E. Road, Near Raj Talkies, RAIPUR fCG) ^!-) ...RESPONDENTS PETITION UNDERARTICLES 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR THE ISSUANCE OF A WRIT IN THE NATURE OF MANDAMUS, PROHIBITION, CERTIORARI ETC. AND ISSUANCE OF OTHER APPROPRIATE DIRECTION

y>w ^'o NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH. BILASPUR WPNo. 375 of 2003 Hji-Prop-Gmmco Ltd.

-~ Petitioner

Versus

Union Bank Of India & Ors.

-- Respondent For Petitioner For Respondents None None Hon'ble Shri Justice Saniav K. Aarawal Order On Board 21/10/2016 1.

The matter was passed over once in absence of any representation on behalf of the petitioner. No one appears for the petitioner even in the second call.

2.

In the circumstances, there is no other option left with the Court but to dismiss the writ petition for want of prosecution. 3.

Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed for want of prosecution. Sd/- Sanjay K. Agrawal Judge Ashu