M.M.Chaturvedi v. State Of Chhattisgarh And ORS.
CT THS HIQH COt%T OF •JTOZCiSkTTMS AT BIIASPUR (C,G») W.1T PETFPIOS N0<. '2>%0 OF BBSWEEN H«M»Cte.atury«die»a ©f'parasNatb Cteaturv^i, aged ab©ut 42 yaars^ WerteiBg %^ Bfcai&ge Officeftr ^ at g^res@mt p^ated at BflilgeMaaa Ferast Divisiea Msrwahi (peastra R®&4) R«sisfl«at ^f Bel©%Maaa Matrict Bila^^ir (03).• ...O'f ^^ ,-••" <--^v^( ^\^l'-ov"
•^,<.c^'a^1^ ?ll'a' stat@ 0f •C'h^attisg^rM^ttere'agto tte-e SgTXTIONES'
A ti'D ^^'
S.ecr^tax'y De^artmeMt ef.jPere^t^ Ma%tralaj^ D..K»S»Buildi»g,Raipitar (CG) • 2.
3&S& Di^risi@B%l P@r^@t Officer^ F@r-sst Dlvisi®awarwalal (pesaolra R®ad),Bil.a^?ur, Distriet; Bilaai^iar (CG) « tgSPQIDBNTS, WIIT; PgTITIGM:.XJEIDgR\ARTICLSS__ 2^6/227 OP.'mS CONSri'ESION OP fmm """"• -T -.-.l...
^ ...^
~':% ;?
"
'..', ^.
:!:::',&^ I"
.^- ./^^ov NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH. BILASPUR WPNo. 380 of 2003 M.M.Chaturvedi -- Petitioner
Versus
State Of Chhattisgarh & Ors.
~~ Respondent For Petitioner For Respondents-State None Shri Shashank Thakur, GA for the State hiN^.;
Hon'ble Shri Justice Prashant Kumar Mishra Order On Board 20/10/2016
1. The matter was passed over oncein absence of any representation on behalf of the petitioner.
No one appears for the petitioner even in the second call.
2.
In the circumstances, there is no other option left with the Court but to dismiss the writ petition for want of prosecution.
3. Accordingty, the writ petition is dismissed for want of prosecution. Sd//- prashant Kumar Mishra Judge Ashu