← Library
High Court Of ChhattisgarhWP/543/2003non prosecution

Food Corporation Of India v. State Of Chhattisgarh And ORS.

2016-12-22Hon'Ble Shri Justice Prashant Kumar Mishra2 pages

SS

IN THE HIGH CQURT OF CHHATTISGARM/

ATBILASPUR ^"' ^ WRIT PETITION N6^teOF200;

Food Corporation of India Through its Regional Manager Regional Office, Raipur (C.G.) PETITIONER

VERSUS

ff:Ss*>t '^ ^State of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary Department of Food DX.S.Bhavan,.(Mantralay) ^aipur (C.G.).

RESPONDENTS ^ TheAdditional Collector (Food) Collectorate, Raipur (C.G.).

^•< /•• '.•'tv'.AW<^^ ^•^e^^^"

f^''. ^""

^ A^ >. Vinod^Parboiling Industries, Throygh its Sole Proprietor-Vinod Kumar Jain S/o. Late L.C.Jain, aged about49 years, Residehtof Abhanpur,DistrictRaipur(c.G) WRIT PETITION UNDERARriCL.E 2%& 227 OF THE CONSTITUTIQNOFINDIA ::£W^ •sSSK

..^?^ ^y '^fe^^^ '"•t''^^ss»i^y HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH. BILAi WP No. 543 of 2003 Food Corporation Of India

Versus

State OfChhattisgarh & Ors.

- Respondent For Petitioner None Hon'ble Shri Justice Prashagt KumarJVIishra Order_On.Board 22/12/2016

1. The matter was passed over once in absence of any representation on behalf of the petitioner. No one appears for the petitioner even in the second call.

2.

In the circumstances, there is no other option left with the Court but to dismiss the writ petition forwant of.prosecution.

3. Accordingly the writ petition is dismissed for want of prosecution. l,:.:Sd//-.r:,:.. 1:^;,'.

Prashant Kumar Mishra :Judge:l;l :..;•- :':,..

Ashu ^-i.

»s :i?a