Kailash Dewangan v. State Of Chhattisgarh

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR WPS No. 2197 of 2016 • Kailash Dewangan S/o Late Shri Kripa Shanker Dewangan, Aged About 46 Years Presently Working As A Platoon, Commander Under The 17th Battalion C.A.F. Kabirdham, District Kabirdham, (Chhattisgarh) ---- Petitioner

Versus

1.

State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, Department Of Home ( Police), Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, New Raipur, (Chhattisgarh) 2.

Director, General Of Police, Police Headquarter, Raipur, District Raipur, (Chhattisgarh) 3.

Additional Director General C.A.F. Police Headquarter Raipur, District Raipur, (Chhattisgarh) 4.

Inspector General C.A.F., Police Headquarter, Raipur, (Chhattisgarh) 5.

Commandant 17th Battalion, Kabirdham, Distt. Kabirdham, (Chhattisgarh) 6.

James Ekka, Assistant Commandant, S.T.F., Bijapur, District Bijapur, (Chhattisgarh) 7.

Nehru Kashyap Presently Working As Platoon Commander S.T.F, Lohandiguda, Bastar, District Bastar (Chhattisgarh) 8.

Sourabh Mishra, Presently Working As H.C., S.T.F. Palanar, District Dantewada, (Chhattisgarh) ---- Respondents --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- For Petitioners : Mr. Sushil Dubey, Advocate For State : Mr. D.R. Minj, Dy. Government Advocate --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Hon'ble Shri Justice Manindra Mohan Shrivastava Order On Board 20/07/2016 1.

Upon instructions, learned State counsel submits that on representation made by the petitioner, the claim of the petitioner is in active consideration and presently, the matter has been sent to the Office of Respondent No.4 - Inspector General C.A.F. Police Headquarter, Raipur for consideration of claim in accordance with the applicable Rules. He submits that at this stage, the petition be

disposed off as the claim of the petitioner has not been rejected till date.

2.

In view of the above submission, there is no need to keep the matter pending when the petitioner's claim is in active consideration of the respondents.

3.

The petition is accordingly disposed off with a direction to decide the claim of the petitioner in accordance with the Rules. In case the petitioner's grievance is not redressed, it would be open for the petitioner to revive petition.

Sd/- (Manindra Mohan Shrivastava) Judge Chandra