← Library
High Court Of ChhattisgarhWPT/74/2017disposed off

Shri Bajrang Power And Ispat Limited v. State Of Chhattisgarh

2017-06-19Hon'Ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal2 pages

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR WPT No. 74 of 2017

1. Shri Bajrang Power And Ispat Limited A Company Duly Registered Under The Companies Act, 1956, Having Its Office And Works At Village Borjhara Industrial State, P. S. & P. O. Urla - Guma Road Raipur, Through Its Director Shri Rajendra Goel, S/o Late Shri Hari Ram Goel, Aged About 59 Years, Resident Of Gurudwara Road, Hari Kripa, Ravi Nagar, Pandri, Raipur Chhattisgarh .

2. Shri Rajendra Goel, S/o Late Shri Hari Ram Goel, Aged About 59 Years Resident Of Gurudwara Road, Hari Kripa, Ravi Nagar, Pandri, Raipur, Chhattisgarh ---- Petitioners

Versus

1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through Principle Secretary, Finance, Mantralaya, Naya Raipur, Chhattisgarh.

2. Additional Chief Secretary Industries And Commerce Department, Mantralaya, Naya Raipur , Chhattisgarh.

3. Commissioner Of Commercial Taxes, Civil Lines Raipur Chhattisgarh.

4. Director, Directorate Of Industries, Udyog Bhavan, Ring Road No. 01, Telibandha, Raipur Chhattisgarh.

---- Respondents For Petitioners :

Mr.Neelabh Dubey, Advocate For State :

Mr.Gary Mukhopadhay, Dy.G.A.

Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal Order on Board 19/06/2017 1.

Against the order dated 3.4.2017 (Annexure P/7) passed by the Director Industry, the petitioners have also filed the review petition before that authority vide Annexure P/8, which is pending consideration.. 2.

Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that Reviewing

Authority be directed to consider and dispose of the review petition expeditiously.

3.

Be that as it may, the Reviewing Authority is directed to consider and dispose of the review petition of the petitioners within a period of three weeks from the date of submission of certificate copy of this order on their behalf.

4.

With the aforesaid observation, the writ petition finally stands disposed of. However, the petitioners are at liberty to proceed depending upon the result of the review petition. No order as to cost(s). Sd/- (Sanjay K. Agrawal) JUDGE B/-