Vikram Saket v. The State Of Chhattisgarh

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR MCRC No. 1512 of 2019 Vikram Saket S/o Shri Narmada Prasad Saket Aged About 20 Years R/o Village Kachani , P. S. Nawanagar, Civil And Revenue District Singrouli M. P., District : Singhrouli, Madhya Pradesh. ---- Applicant

Versus

The State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Station House Officer, Police Station Ambikapur, District Surguja Chhattisgarh, District : Surguja (Ambikapur), Chhattisgarh.

---- Respondent For the Applicant :

Shri Sumit Shrivastava, Advocate For the State :

Shri Wasim Miyan, Panel Lawyer ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Hon'ble Shri Justice Sharad Kumar Gupta Order On Board /03/2019

1. This is the first bail application under Section 439 of the CrPC and there is no bail application is pending before any other Court.

2. Perused the case diary provided by the learned counsel for the State in connection with the Crime No.512/2018 registered at Police Station Ambikapur, District Surguja (C.G.) for the offence punishable under Sections 398, 395, 323 of IPC and Section 25 & 27 of Arms Act.

3. Case of the prosecution, in brief is that on 07/10/2018 about 11.50 p.m. complainant Vikram Pratap Singh was going to safeguard room by motorcycle, after collecting Rs.4,85,180/- from the foreign liquor shop Boripara. On the way three unknown masked persons stopped him, one person gave blow, another person get down him from the motorcycle, third person pointed the pistol on his chest, gave threats to kill. Two persons robbed one bag from him containing Rs.4,85,100/-, one purse containing Rs.900/-, some documents, his motorcycle bearing registration number C.G. 15 D.D. 7697. On the memorandum of applicant Rs.1,15,000/-, one motorcycle bearing same registration number were seized from him.

4. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that he is innocent and falsely implicated in the present case, therefore, he shall be released on bail.

5. On the other hand, counsel for the State opposes the bail application. He further submits that no criminal antecedents against the applicant.

6. Looking to the facts and circumstances of the case, looking to the seriousness of the alleged offence, looking to the impact of granting bail to the applicant on society, the present bail application is rejected. Sd/- (Sharad Kumar Gupta) Judge Kamde