Lakheshwar Patel v. State Of Chhattisgarh
NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR WPS No.2553 of 2016 Lakheshwar Patel S/o. Shri Digambar Patel, Aged About 34 Years Occupation Assistant Teacher (Panchayat) At Govt. Primary School Keshla, Block/ Janpad Panchayat/ Tahsil Pussour, District Raigarh (Chhattisgarh) R/o. Village Belpali, Tahsil Pussour And District Raigarh (Chhattisgarh) ---- Petitioner
Versus
1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Department Of Panchayat And Rural Development, Mantralaya, Naya Raipur District Raipur (Chhattisgarh)
2. The Collector Raigarh, District Raigarh (Chhattisgarh).
3. The Chief Executive Officer, Zila Panchayat Raigarh District Raigarh (Chhattisgarh)
4. The Chief Executive Officer, Zila Panchayat Baloda Bazar District Baloda Bazar (Chhattisgarh)
5. The Chief Executive Officer, Janpad Panchayat Raigarh District Raigarh (Chhattisgarh)
6. The Block Education Officer, Pussour, Tahsil Pussour, District Raigarh (Chhattisgarh) ---- Respondents For Petitioner :
Shri Abhishek Saraf, Advocate For Respondent/State :
Shri D. R. Minz, Dy.GA Hon'ble Shri Justice Manindra Mohan Shrivastava Order On Board 01/07/2016 The petitioner has challenged the transfer order dated 18.04.2016 on several grounds. One of which ground that has been raised in the petition is that the order violates the policy of keeping husband and wife together as far as possible.
2. The petitioner preferred this petition without filing his representation probably for the reason that the order is sought to be challenged on the ground of jurisdiction as well.
3. However, the ground that the broad policy of keeping the husband and wife together as far as possible requires consideration, it is expedient at this stage to dispose of the
petition with a direction to the petitioner to represent his case within 10 days from today before the competent authority who passed the transfer order and the same shall be decided within a period of 3 weeks from the date of receipt of the representation. Meanwhile, for a period 3 weeks the impugned transfer order shall not be given effect to in relation to the petitioner.
4. With the aforesaid observation the petition is disposed of. Sd/- (Manindra Mohan Shrivatava) JUDGE Tumane