Sanat(Wrongly Mentioned Sanad) Patel v. State Of Chhattisgarh

-1NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 850 of 2020

1. Sanat (Wrongly Mentioned Sanad) Patel, S/o Vishram Patel, Aged About 46 Years, (Wrongly Mentioned As Sanad Patel In Judgment of The Civil Court), Resident of Village Darba, Tahsil Arang, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh ---- Petitioner

Versus

1. State of Chhattisgarh Through Collector Raipur, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh

2. Upper Collector Raipur, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh

3. Sub Divisional Officer (Revenue) Arang, Tahsil Arang, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh

4. Naib Tahsildar, Mandir Hasod, Tahsil Arang, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh ----- Respondents For Petitioner : Mr. C.R. Sahu, Advocate For State : Mr. Ayaz Naved, Govt. Advocate Hon'ble Shri Justice P. Sam Koshy Order on Board 06.03.2020

1. The limited relief that the petitioner has sought for is for an appropriate direction to the respondent no. 4 to take a decision on the application for mutation of the property pending before the respondent no. 4 inrespect-of property over which the petitioner has a decree in his favour from the competent civil court, the application is pending consideration since 2017.

2. Given the limited relief sought for by the counsel for the petitioner is not opposed by the State counsel.

-23. Accordingly, the respondent no. 4 is directed to ensure that the proceeding for mutation initiated by the petitioner by way of application be decided, at the earliest preferably, within a period of four months from the date of receipt of copy of this Order. The writ petition accordingly, stands disposed off.

Sd/- (P. Sam Koshy) Judge Rahul