Deepak Kumar Budhadeo v. State Of Chhattisgarh And Others

U/ IN lg}? HIGH CGURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR g5 9 563% (E?

My"

FIRST APPEAL N0.

_*LI_Q'___;2003 {g \ él'

_ Deepak Kumar Buddhadeo, S/'e Late APEELLANT gm mm?

(/ Shri Laiji Bhai, agad 52 years, R10 Gandhi Chowk, Rajnandgaon {CA1 -VERSUS- :

1§ Siam of Chhattiggarh through "

Collector, Rajnaadgaon IQG.) " 2.

Shri Ami Iain, gs/DHENDANTS The than Collector' Rajnandgaon '

t '

ic éURT'» FFE.E;;

.

'

I presently po$ted as Habhadh -'

Sanchalak, ME. Laghu Udyog .I.

-'

_-'

§ Nigam, Department of Commerce r \ :

& Industry, Bhopai 1MP.) V .

3'"

Shri Anurag Diwan'

The then 85 Present Khanij :'

\Q A dhikari, District Offrce - 'g Rajmmdgann (C.G.) r;

.

Q.A.Khan, Tahsildar' Rajnandgaan (C.G.) '

Shri R.R.Khan, x4;

f The men Khanij Nirikshak, (x Rajnandgaon and presently Khanij Nirikshaka Khanij Vibhag, Dietrict ,Offme-Raipur (C13,) V» Valuatian of amgeal: Rs. 54.5%fgAs in Court below} Court fees aid :

Rs.

6 341M As in Court below A;

J/l FIRST M'PE AL UNDER SECTION 96 OF THE CIVIL ?ROCEDURE

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATnscARH BlLAspun EA N0. 110 OF 2003 (Arising out ofjudgment/order dated 161 2003 in Civil Suit No.3/ 3/2001 passed by [earned First Additidnal DistrictJudge, Rajnandgaon) c Deepak Kumar Budhadeo ---- Petitioner

Versus

'

State OF Chhattisgarh And Others --~- Respondent For Appellant None For Respondent /State Mr. Sameer Behar, Panel Lawyer l Hon'ble Shri Justice Prashant Kumar Mishra Order (in Board l £[10L2017 T, Since there is no representation on behalf OF the appellant even in two rounds, this Court is left with no other option except to dismiss this appeal For want OF prosecution.

2.

Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed For want of prosecution. Sd/- Prashant Kumar Mishra \ \\ l Judge i'

V Shyna