← Library
High Court Of ChhattisgarhWP/2119/2003dissmiss for defaultnonprosecution

Vijay Pandey v. State Of Chhattisgarh And ORS.

2017-05-12Hon'Ble Shri Justice Chandra Bhushan Bajpai2 pages

I RE N THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATU AT BILASPUR (C.G.) W.P.NO.

2LL9 [2003 INTHE MATTER OF':

, / fIJAY PANDEY, aged 45 years, "Son of Late Rajjulal Pandey '

Ex-Mayor, Municipal Corporation 1"

Rajnandgaon, Resident of Kailash Nagar, Rajnandgaon

VERSUS

Q- "3""$Eqp/ '

DENTS §r THE STATE OF CHHATTISGARH "

;

'

z/t Through the Secretary to the / / Government of Chhattlsgarh, 4,0,) Department of Environment and Urban Development, D.K.S.

Bhavan, Raipur (,C.G.) .-B?K?'.INH% Special Secretary, Government of Chhcttisgarh, Department of Environment and Urban Deveiopment, D.K.S.

Bhavan, Raipur (C.G.) - SUDESH DESHMUKH, Son of N.R. Deshmukh, Speaker, Rajnandgaon, Municipai Corporation, Ward No.3, Rajnan/Vdgaon G.

Q '7} f if '

P TITION UNDER ARTICLES 226/227 OF TH w @NSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR THE ISSUANCE OF , RITS IN THE NATURE OF MANDAMUS/ t '

aW 33CERTIORARII ETC.

ETC. AND/OR FOR ORDER(S) AND/OR DIRECTION(S) IN THE NATURE OF WRITS

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTIS ARH BILASPUR WP No. 2119 of 2003 Vijay Pandey -V_ State of Chhattisgarh and others '

Ne.

on For Respondent Not 1 and 2/State Mr. Neeraj Sharma, y. GA.

For respondent No. 3 None.

For petitioner '

Honble Shri Justice Chandra Bhgshan Baigai Order On Board 12/05/201 7 1.

Th mts in the weekly tist fromv 8-5-2017 and since then, it has e ater'i ,been' called out many times for hearing but no representation is made itio od 'y also t on behalf of the pet the matter is taken up wice for '

hearing but none a etitioner.

ln these circumstances, r p pp this court is left with pt to dismiss the petition for wat of no option exce n prosecution N fore dismissed for ru The petition is there, want of posection.

S/- ci handra Bhushan Bajpai Judge lha Pak