Lakhan Das Manikpuri v. State Of Chhattisgarh

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 1691 of 2019

1. Lakhan Das Manikpuri S/o Shri Phool Das Manikpuri, Aged About 39 Years, R/o Ward No.12 (Singhori) Bemetara, Tehsil And District Bemetara Chhattisgarh

2. Nand Kishore Vaishnav S/o Shri Krishna Kumar Vaishnav, Aged About 41 Years, R/o Ward No.15, Nayapara Bemetara, Tehsil And Police Station Bemetara District Bemetara Chhattisgarh

3. Bhanu Pratap Anant S/o Shri Mangal Das Anant, Aged About 28 Years, R/o Village Toora Semariya, Post Bemetara, Tehsil And Thana Khamhariya, Block Saja, Police Station Bemetara, District Bemetara Chhattisgarh

4. Rajesh Jangde S/o Saheb Das, Aged About 30 Years, R/o Village Kharhari, Post Office Nandal, Tehsil Nawagarh, Block Nawagarh, District Bemetara Chhattisgarh ---- Petitioners

Versus

1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary Department Of Energy, Mahanadi Bhawan Naya Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh

2. The Chhattisgarh State Power Distribution Company Limited Through Its Managing Director Gudhari Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh

3. The Superintending Engineer (S E Circle) Chhattisgarh State Power Distribution Company Limited Durg, District Durg Chhattisgarh

4. The Executive Engineer, Power Distribution Company Limited Division Bemetara, District Bemetara Chhattisgarh

5. The Executive Engineer, Power Distribution Company Limited Division Saja, District Bemetara, Chhattisgarh

6. M/s Suraj Associates (Joint Venture) Block No.6/D, Street-29, SectorI Bhilai, District Durg, Chhattisgarh ---- Respondents

For petitioners :

Shri Vinay Pandey, Advocate.

For State :

Shri Smir Behar, P.L.

Hon'ble Shri Justice P. Sam Koshy Order on Board 11/03/2019 Without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case so far as the relief sought for, counsel for the petitioners prays that since the representation of the petitioners in respect of their claim is already pending consideration before the respondent authorities, the respondents may be directed to consider the representation and take an appropriate decision. 2.

Given the said limited prayer made by the petitioners, the present writ petition stands disposed of with a direction to the concerned respondents to consider and decide the representation of the petitioners in accordance with the rules and regulations governing the field. 3.

The writ petition accordingly stands disposed of. Sd/- (P. Sam Koshy) JUDGE Khatai