Pushpalata Garg v. State Of Chhattisgarh

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR WPS No. 2132 of 2018 Pushpalata Garg D/o Vijay Kumar Garg , Aged About 42 Years R/o House No. 15 / 195 Ramsagarpara , In Front Of Mahihar Complex , Jawahar Nagar Ward Raipur District Raipur Chhattisgarh., District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh ---- Petitioner

Versus

1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary Department Of Panchayat Mahanadi Bhavan Mantralaya New Raipur District Raipur Chhattisgarh., District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh

2. State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary Department Of School Education Mahanadi Bhavan Mantralaya New Raipur District Raipur Chhattisgarh., District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh

3. Jila Panchayat Baloda Bazaar Through Chief Executive Officer , Jila Panchayat Baloda Bazaar Bhatapara Chhattisgarh ( Old District Raipur Chhattisgarh), District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh ---- Respondents ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- For petitioner :

Mr. A. P. Sharma, Advocate.

For State :

Mr. Majid Ali, Dy. GA ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Hon'ble Shri Justice Manindra Mohan Shrivastava Order on Board 08/03/2018 1.

Learned counsel for the parties would submit that the issue raised in this petition is squarely covered by order dated 28.11.2017 passed by this Court in WPS No. 2530 of 2017 (Mukesh Kumar Patel and another Vs. State of Chhattisgarh and another) and batch of petitions wherein the circular dated 23.04.2016 has been quashed, petitions allowed and it has been declared that the petitioners therein shall be entitled to obtain the benefit of revised pay-scale on completion of 8 years service by including the services rendered by them on a lower post or on the same post.

2.

In view of the aforesaid submission and the impugned order and action is

based on circular dated 23.04.2016 which has been quashed in the case referred to herein above, the petition also deserves to be allowed with the direction that the petitioner shall be entitled to obtain the benefit of revised payscale on completion of 8 years service by including the services rendered by him on a lower post or on the same post.

3.

No order as to costs.

Sd/- (Manindra Mohan Shrivastava) Judge Rohit