Guharam And Others v. Smt.Brihaspati And Another

?t> NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH. BILASPUR Second Appeal No. 391 of 2003 n 1.

Guha Ram aged 40 years, 2.

Shv Shankar, aged 19 years, Both son of late Budaga 3.

Kirtan Bai, aged 42 years, 4.

Khikh Bai, aged 34 years, 5.

Khir Bai, aged 29 years, from 3 to 6 daughter of Budga 6.

Anand Kunwar, aged 65 years, W/o Budaga. AII caste - Kurmi, resident of village Karmanda, P.S. & Tahsil Janjgir, Distt. JanjgirChampa (C.G.) -- Appellants

Versus

1.

Smt. Brihaspati Bai W/o Guharam, D/o Bhuwaneshwar, resident ofAmora, Distt. Janjgir-Champa (C.G.) n 2.

State of Chhattisgarh, Through Collector, Distt. Janjgir-Champa -- Respondents For Appellants : None for the appellar)ts For State : Shri R.K. Jaiswal, Panel Lawyer ^..- Hon'ble Shri Sharad Kumar Gupta. Judae Order on Board 22/09/2017 1.

Even in the second call, none appears nor any representation is made on behalf of the appellants, therefore, the Court has no other option except to dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. 2.

Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution. Sd/- Sharad Kumar Gupta Judge Kamde