Bishwa Mohan Narayan Singh v. Hindustan Steel Works
NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR WPS No. 7977 of 2011 Bishwa Mohan Narayan Singh, son of Late Shri Ram Prit Singh, aged about 58 years, resident of Qr. No.3-F, Street KCS Sector-8, Bhilai, District Durg, Chhattisgarh ---- Petitioner
Versus
Hindustan Steelworks Contruction Ltd., A Government of India Undertaking, having it's registered office at 1, Shakespeare Sarani, 8th Floor, Kolata-71, through it's Chairman-cum-Managing Director. Senior Manager (Personeel), Hindustan Steelworks Construction Limited, 1, Shakespeare Sarani, 8th Floor, Kolkata -71 Group General Manager, Hindustan Steelworks Construction Limited, Bhilai Unit, Post Office Bhilai, District Durg Chhattisgarh ---- Respondent For Petitioners Mr. Amrito Das, Advocate For Respondents Mr. Vinod Deshmukh, Advocate Hon'ble Shri Justice Prashant Kumar Mishra Order On Board 20/4/2017 1.
At the very outset, learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that petitioner's case is covered by the judgment rendered by this Court in Writ Appeal No.185 of 2007 Hindustan Steelworks Construction Ltd. & another v. Smt. Kiran Sahu & others) decided on 3.2.2015 and, therefore, in light of above judgment, he may be permitted to make representation before the competent authorityand the same may be directed to be decided within the specific time frame 2.
Per contra, Shri Vinod Deshmukh, learned counsel for the
respondents would submit that the following payments has already been made to the petitioner.
CPF Rs. 954982.91 paid on 21.7.2003 CPF Arrear Rs.22,680.83 paid on 21.4.2004 Gratuity Rs.2,50,313.00 paid on 22.1.2003 Leave Encash Rs.68,843/- paid on 20.01.2003 Ex-gratia Rs.7,02,962/- paid on 28.12.2002 Backlog salary Rs.1,40,000 paid on 19.5.2003 Shri Deshmjukh would submit that the representation of the petitioner would be decided.
3.Be that as it may, if the petitioner files representation before the competent authority for redressal of his grievances, it is expected from the authority concerned to decide the same in the light of judgment of this Court in W.A. No.185/2007 decided on 3.2.2015 in accordance with law expeditiously preferably within a period of three months from the date of receipt of representation.
4.With the aforesaid observation, the writ petition stands finally disposed of.
Sd/- Judge (Prashant Kumar Mishra Gowri