← Library
High Court Of ChhattisgarhCRMP/240/2007non prosecution

Balram Thawait v. Smt. Indira Thawait

2015-03-05Hon'Ble Shri Justice T. P. Sharma,Hon'Ble Shri Justice Inder Singh Uboweja2 pages

5n'R%^S THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR CRMP No. ^°72007 o^ PfflTIONER €)-,,..^- „....J^^]^°- Balram Thawait, S/o Rameshwar Prasad Thawait, aged about 56 years, R/q Viill.

Jaitpur, P.S.

Masturi, Tah.

& Distt. Bilaspur (C.G.) : •^^"

^^ o ^ ^ERSUS ^d^^5{{ Smt.

Indira Thawait,A W/o Balram Thawait, R/o Vill.

Jaitpur, P.S.

Masturi, Tah. & Distt. Bilaspur (C.G.) RESPONDENT I.'

PETITION UNDER SECTION-482 OF THE Cr. P.C,.

HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR Coram: HON'BLE MR. T.P.SHARMA & HON'BLE MR. I.S.UBOWEJA, JJ.

CRMP No. 240 of 2007 PETITIONER Balram Thawait

Versus

Smt. Indira Thawait RESPONDENT f [Petition under Section 482 ofthe Code of Criminal Procedure] Appearance:

?

None for thei iSgtHiioner.

None for the |espC»hdent.

ORDER

(5thMarch,2015) Per T.P.Sharma, J.:- 1.

When the case is called out for tiearing second time, no one appears on behalf of the petitioner.

2.

By this petition under Section 482 of the Code Criminal Procedure, the petitioner has prays forqyashment oforder dated 19.12.1995 passed by •-A the VI Ith Additional Sessions Judge, Bilaspur in Cr. Rev.No. 128/94, whereby the Court below, while allowing the revision, has awarded the maintenance of Rs.500/- to the respondent.

3.

We don't find any illegality in the order impugned. 4.

Consequently, in absence of any representation on behalf of the petitioner, the petition is liable to be and is hereby dismissed. Sd/- Inder Singh Ubeweja Judge Sd/- T.P. Sharma Judge chandra