Worf Technology v. Union Of India
NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR WPC No. 1855 of 2017 Worf Technology Through Its Proprietor, Anguri Devi, W/o Late Shri M. C. Aggarwal, Aged About Age 78 Years, R/o C-1/11, Sector-15, Rohini, Delhi 110089, India, Police Station K. N. Katju Marg. ---- Petitioner
Versus
1. Union Of India Through Its Secretary, Ministry Of Electronics & Information Technology, A-Block, CGO Complex, Lodhi Road, New Delhi 110003.
2. State Of Chhattisgarh, Through Secretary, Department Of Electronics & IT, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Naya Raipur (Chhattisgarh).
3. Chhattisgarh State Industrial Development Corporation Limited, (CSIDC), Through Managing Director, Having It Office At, 1st Floor, Udyog Bhawan, Ring Road No. 1, Telibandha, Raipur 492006, Chhattisgarh.
4. Naya Raipur Electronics Manufacturing Cluster Pvt. Ltd., Through Chairman Soloman Methusila, Registered Office Udyog Bhawan, Near Sona Khan, Ring Road-1, Raipur 492001 Chhattisgarh.
5. State Investment Promotion Board (SIPB), Through Convenor, Department Of Commerce And Industries, Renuka Dwar, Shashtri Chowk, Raipur (Chhattisgarh) 492001.
6. Department Of Town And Country Planning, Government Of Chhattisgarh, Through Its Director, Indravati Bhawan, Naya Raipur, Chhattisgarh ---- Respondents And WPC No. 1863 of 2017 M/s Techno World, Through its Proprietor, Smt. Sukriti Aggarwal, Aged about 28 years, D/o Shri Sunil Aggarwal, R/o C-10/28, Sector15, Rohini, Delhi-110089, India, Police Station-K.N. Katju Marg ---- Petitioner
Versus
1. Union Of India Through Its Secretary, Ministry Of Electronics & Information Technology, A- Block, C G O Complex, Lodhi Road, New Delhi 110003.
2. State Of Chhattisgarh, Through Secretary, Department Of Electronics & IT, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Naya Raipur (Chhattisgarh).
3. Chhattisgarh State Industrial Development Corporation Limited, (CSIDC), Through Managing Director, Having It Office At, 1st Floor, Udyog Bhawan, Ring Road No. 1, Telibandha, Raipur 492006, Chhattisgarh.
4. Naya Raipur Electronics Manufacturing Cluster Pvt. Ltd., Through Chairman Soloman Methusila, Registered Office Udyog Bhawan, Near Sona Khan, Ring Road -1, Raipur 492001
Chhattisgarh.
5. State Investment Promotion Board (SIPB), Through Convenor, Department Of Commerce And Industries, Renuka Dwar, Shashtri Chowk, Raipur (Chhattisgarh) 492001.
6. Department Of Town And Country Planning, Government Of Chhattisgarh, Through Its Director, Indravati Bhawan, Naya Raipur, Chhattisgarh ---- Respondents And WPC No. 1868 of 2017 M/s Gaint Souk Through its Proprietor Smt. Rekha Aggarwal, W/o Shri Sunil Aggarwal, Aged about 37 years, R/o C-2/20, Sector-15, Rohini, Delhi 110089 Police Station K. N. Katju Marg.
---- Petitioner
Versus
1. Union Of India Through Its Secretary, Ministry Of Electronics & Information Technology, A- Block, C G O Complex, Lodhi Road, New Delhi 110003.
2. State Of Chhattisgarh, Through Secretary, Department Of Electronics & IT, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Naya Raipur (Chhattisgarh).
3. Chhattisgarh State Industrial Development Corporation Limited, (CSIDC), Through Managing Director, Having It Office At, 1st Floor, Udyog Bhawan, Ring Road No. 1, Telibandha, Raipur 492006, Chhattisgarh.
4. Naya Raipur Electronics Manufacturing Cluster Pvt. Ltd., Through Chairman Soloman Methusila, Registered Office Udyog Bhawan, Near Sona Khan, Ring Road -1, Raipur 492001 Chhattisgarh.
5. State Investment Promotion Board (SIPB), Through Convenor, Department Of Commerce And Industries, Renuka Dwar, Shashtri Chowk, Raipur (Chhattisgarh) 492001.
6. Department Of Town And Country Planning, Government Of Chhattisgarh, Through Its Director, Indravati Bhawan, Naya Raipur, Chhattisgarh For Petitioners :
Ms Meha Kumar, Advocate For State :
Mr.Shashank Thakur, G.A.
For Respondents No.3&4 :
Mr.Kasif Shakeel, Advocate Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal Order on Board 13/7/2017
1. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this writ petitions with liberty to file duly
constituted petition in accordance with the Rules.
2. Permission granted.
3. Accordingly, the writ petitions are dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty in favour of the petitioners. No order as to cost(s). Sd/- (Sanjay K. Agrawal) Judge B/-