Jai Lakshmi Maa Swa Sahayata Samuh, Gram Manohara, v. State Of Chhattisgarh

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR WPC No. 675 of 2018 Jai Lakshmi Maa Swa Sahayata Samuh, Gram Manohara, Development Block Simga, District- Baloda Bazar- Bhatapara, Chhattisgarh. Through It's President, Smt. Mantora Sahu, Wife Of Shri Ramsahai Sahu, Aged About 58 Years, Resident Of Gram Manohara, Hathbandh, Development Block Simga, District- BalodaBazar- Bhatapara, Chhattisgarh., District : BalodabazarBhathapara, Chhattisgarh ---- Petitioner

Versus

1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Department Of Women And Child Development, Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantralaya, Naya Raipur, District- Raipur, Chhattisgarh., District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh

2. Commissioner, Department Of Women And Child Development, Indravati Bhawan, Naya Raipur, Mandir Hasod, District- Raipur, Chhattisgarh., District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh

3. District Collector, Collectorate, Baloda Bazar, District- Baloda Bazar- Bhatapara, Chhattisgarh., District : BalodabazarBhathapara, Chhattisgarh

4. District Programme Officer, Women And Child Development Department, Collectorate Compound, District Baloda BazarBhatapara, Chhattisgarh., District : Balodabazar-Bhathapara, Chhattisgarh

5. Child Development Project Officer, Integrated Child Development Project, Simga, District- Baloda Bazar- Bhatapara, Chhattisgarh., District : Balodabazar-Bhathapara, Chhattisgarh ---- Respondents For Petitioners : Shri Amrito Das, Advocate.

For State : Shri Arun Sao, Dy. Advocate General. Order On Board 14/03/2018 (1) Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would submit that by virtue of clause 11.3 of the amended instructions dated 05.06.2017, the

petitioner is entitled to continue for the period of five years and then only the circular dated 05.06.2017 would apply but on the other hand by order dated 01.02.2018, District Programme Officer has called for fresh application for supply of ready to eat food for his area i.e. Sector Limtara under the Simga project.

(2) Be that as it may, the petitioner is at liberty to make representation before the District Programme Officer within a period of seven days from today bringing to his notice Clause 11.3 of the amended instructions dated 05.06.2017, which shall be considered and decided within a further period of seven days from the date of receipt of such representation in accordance with law.

(3) With the aforesaid observations, the writ petition stands finally disposed of.

Sd/- (Sanjay K. Agrawal) Judge D/-