High Court Of ChhattisgarhWPC/836/2019disposed off

Shaukhilal v. State Of Chhattisgarh

2019-03-11Hon'Ble Shri Justice Prashant Kumar Mishra2 pages

1 WPC No. 836 of 2019 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR WPC No. 836 of 2019

1. Shaukhilal S/o Late Shri Gendram Patel, Aged About 37 Years, R/o Village Nirtu, P. S. Koni, Tahsil Takhatpur, District Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh.

2. Bahoran S/o Late Shri Gendram Patel Aged About 30 Years, R/o Village Nirtu, P. S. Koni, Tahsil Takhatpur, District Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh.

3. Jitendra S/o Late Shri Gendram Patel, Aged About 23 Years, R/o Village Nirtu, P. S. Koni, Tahsil Takhatpur, District Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh.

4. Puratan Wd/o Late Shri Gendram Patel, Aged About 65 Years, R/o Village Nirtu, P. S. Koni, Tahsil Takhatpur, District Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh.

---- Petitioners

Versus

1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through Its Secretary, Department Revenue, Mahanadi Bhavan, Atal Nagar, District Raipur Chhattisgarh.

2. Collector Bilaspur District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh.

3. Land Acquisition Officer-Cum-Sub Divisional Officer (Revenue) Of Sub Division, Head Office Bilaspur District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh.

---- Respondents

2 WPC No. 836 of 2019 For Petitioner(s) :- Shri Vimal Kumar Tondey, Advocate For Respondent-State :- Shri Rahul Jha, G.A.

Order On Board By Hon'ble Justice Shri Prashant Kumar Mishra 11/03/2019

1. In the present petition, it is contended that though the land of the petitioners was acquired and the compensation was paid, but the rehabilitation grant on the basis of the Notification dated 04.01.2017, which was published in an extraordinary Gazette of Chhattisgarh, has not been given. It is further contended that the petitioners have made necessary representation to the concerned authorities, therefore, the authorities may be directed to decide the representation.

2. Without entering into the merits of the case, considering the limited prayer, it is directed that if the petitioners make a fresh representation before the concerned Collector, the Collector may decide the same objectively within a period of 3 months.

3. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of. Sd/- Prashant Kumar Mishra Judge Ankit