Dhansahay Lahre v. State Of Chhattisgarh

HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR WPS No. 1685 of 2020

1. Dhansahay Lahare, S/o. Ramcharan Lahare, Aged About 51 Years, Working As Assistant Teacher (L.B.) At Government Primary School Chandaniyapara Dongakohroud, Block Pamgarh, District Janjgir-Champa Chhattisgarh

2. Goverdhan Prasad Sahu, S/o. Daya Ram Sahu, Aged About 55 Years, Working As Assistant Teacher (L.B.) At Government Primary School Pakariya, Block Pamgarh, District Janjgir-Champa Chhattisgarh ---- Petitioners

Versus

1. State Of Chhattisgarh, Through The Secretary, Department Of Panchayat And Rural Development, Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantralaya, Naya Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh

2. Secretary, Department Of School Education, Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantralaya, Naya Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh

3. Commissioner Cum Director, Directorate Of Panchayat, Atal Nagar New Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh

4. Director, Directorate Of Public Instruction, Indravati Bhawan, Naya Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh

5. Chief Executive Officer, Janpad Panchayat Pamgarh, District JanjgirChampa Chhattisgarh

6. District Education Officer, District Janjgir-Champa Chhattisgarh

7. Block Education Officer, Pamgarh, District Janjgir-Champa Chhattisgarh ---- Respondents For Petitioner :

Mr. Govind Dewangan, Advocate For State :

Mr. Neeraj Pradhan, Panel Lawyer Hon'ble Shri Justice Goutam Bhaduri Order On Board 12.03.2020 Heard.

1. Learned counsel for the petitioners would submit that the issue involved in the present writ petition has already been considered and decided by this Court in WPS No.3088 of 2019, therefore, the same order may be passed in the present writ petition also.

2. This Court in WPS No.3088 of 2019 on 07.02.2019 has passed the following order:- "1.

The limited grievance of the petitioners is that they are entitled for the benefit of Kramonnati on completing 10 years of service which they have completed but they have not been given the same till date.

2.

Given the limited grievance raised, let the petitioners make detailed representation in this regard to respondents No. 3 & 4 who in turn shall scrutinize the same and pass a suitable order in accordance with the rules governing the field of Kramonnati. It is expected that an appropriate order shall be passed within a period of 4 months from the date of receipt of representation of the petitioners.

3.

With the aforesaid observation, the writ petition stands disposed of."

3. Learned State counsel has no objection.

4. It is ordered accordingly. The ratio laid down in the case supra shall also govern the cause of lis in this case and will have the same effect and operation.

5. With such observation, the writ petition stands disposed of. Sd/- Goutam Bhaduri Judge Ashok