High Court Of ChhattisgarhWPC/638/2018disposed off

Mohammad Wahid v. Municipal Corporation Of Raipur

2018-03-14Hon'Ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal3 pages

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR Writ Petition (C) No.

6 3 8 of 201 Mohammad Wahid, S/o Mohd. Ismile, aged about 48 years, R/o behind Madarsa, Bajnathpara, Sanjay Nagar, Police StationTakarapara, Raipur, Distt. Raipur (C.G.) ---- Petitioner

Versus

1. Municipal Corporation of Raipur, through its Commissioner, Municipal Corporation, Raipur (C.G.)

2. Secretary, Department of Urban Administration & Development Mantralaya, Raipur (C.G.) ---- Respondents Writ Petition (C) No.

6 42 of 201 Kishori Yadav, D/o Late Domu Yadav, aged about 55 years, R/o Amanaka, Police Station- Saraswati Nagar, Raipur, Distt. Raipur (C.G.) ---- Petitioner

Versus

1. Municipal Corporation of Raipur, through its Commissioner, Municipal Corporation, Raipur (C.G.)

2. Secretary, Department of Urban Administration & Development Mantralaya, Raipur (C.G.) ---- Respondents Writ Petition (C) No.

6 43 of 201 Yusuf Khan, S/o Nashirulla Khan, aged about 40 years, R/o Chunabhatti, Police Station - Ganj Thana, Raipur, Distt. Raipur (C.G.) ---- Petitioner

Versus

1. Municipal Corporation of Raipur, through its Commissioner, Municipal Corporation, Raipur (C.G.)

2. Secretary, Department of Urban Administration & Development Mantralaya, Raipur (C.G.)

For Petitioners : Ms. Rajni Soren, Advocate. For Respondent No.1 : Mr. H.B. Agrawal, Senior Advocate assisted by Shri Pankaj Agrawal, Advocate.

For Respondent No. 2 : Shri Arun Sao, Dy. A.G. Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal Order On Board 1 4 /0 3 /201 (1) Since common question of law and fact is involved in this batch of writ petitions, they are heard together and are being disposed of by this common order.

(2) Learned counsel for the petitioners would submit that the respondent No. 1- Municipal Corporation be directed to issue vending identity card in accordance with the provisions of the Street Vendors (Protection of Livelihood and Regulation of Street Vending) Act, 2014 (henceforth 'Act of 2014'), for which they have made application before the respondent No.1- Municipal Corporation.

(3) Prayer appears to be fair and reasonable and accordingly the same is alllowed.

(4) Be that as it may, the respondent No.1- Commissioner, Municipal Corporation, Raipur is directed to consider and decide the application filed by the petitioner for issuing vending identity card strictly in accordance with law expeditiously.

(5) With the aforesaid observations, the writ petitions stand finally disposed of.

Sd/- (Sanjay K. Agrawal) Judge