← Library
High Court Of ChhattisgarhMCC/993/2014disposed off

Hiren Kumar Khastriya v. State Of Chhattisgarh And ORS.

2015-01-20Hon'Ble Shri Justice T. P. Sharma,Hon'Ble Shri Justice Chandra Bhushan Bajpai3 pages

^, ^-

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR (C.G.)

M.C.C. No.99^/2014 (ARISING OUT OF ORDER DATED 19.03.2014 PASSED BY HON'BLE HIGH COURT IN W.P.fS) NorT321/2014) PETITIONER Hiren Kumar Khastriya Aged about 48 years, i^^ .^^^ S/o. Shri Ram Bachan Singh ,vv'^<;^^'

->v,& R/o. Village Mongra, P.0. Kosami, ^ P.S. Chhura, District-Gariyaband (CG) ..^ "^

Versus

^- RESPONDENTS

1. ^The State of Chhattisgarh, : The Secretaiy, Govt.

of Chhattisgarh, Department of Panchayat 8& Rural Development, Mahanadi Bhawan, New Mantralaya, P.S. Mandir Hasaud, Raipur (C.G.) ^-2. The Collector, District-Gariyaband (C.G.) ^3. The Chief Executive Officer, Janpad Panchayat - Chhura, District-Gariyaband (C.G.)

4. The Block Education Officer, ^ Block-Chhura, District-Gariyaband (C.G.) APPLICATION FOR MODIFICATION IN THE

ORDER

DATED 19.U3.2014J)ASSED BY THE HON'BLE COURT PASSED IN W.P.fS) No. 1321/2014 (HIREN KUMAR KHASTRIYA VS. STATE OF C.G. & OTHERS).

r

'A ^r'

IN THEHIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH. BILASPUR DIVISION BENCH HON'BLE MR.T.P. SHARMA. & HON'BLE MR. C.B. BAJPAI. JJ M.C.C.No. 993 of 2014 Petitioner Hiren Kumar Khastriya versus Respondents 1.

The State of Chhattisgarh.

a Z TheCollector, District Gariyaband.

3.

The CnieWixecutWe Officer, Chhura, District GariyaBand.

4.

The Block EdiucationQff\^r, Chhura, DistriGt Gariyaband.

APPLICATIO FOR MO©IBICATIONOF ORDER DATED 19.03.2014 PASSEB IN W.P.(S)NO. 1321/2014 Appearance:

Mr. SaijiJfeett^tafiU.-^nsel for the petitioner. Ms. PuslR|ggBg|viiifPanel Lawyerforthe State. !

OR DER (20.01.2015) T.P. SHARMA. J Heard.

1.

This is petition for modification of order dated 19.03.2014 passed in W.P.(S)No.1321 of 2014 by the learned Single Judge.

2.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that respondent has not decided the representation filed on behalf ofthe petitioner till today, therefore,some time limit be fixed.

^"^^ .^^-:"\ <:'v- '\i ^ N v.?^.b ^ ^.v^ ^ '•^s^ '^i^^,^ 3.

Respondent authorities are under obligation to act in accordance with law and also respect the order of the High Court.

4.

With these observations, the petition stands disposed of. No order as to costs.

Sd/- C. B. Bajpai Judge Sd/- T.P. Sharma Judge ^^Vijay