← Library
High Court Of ChhattisgarhWPC/757/2018dismissed

Durga Swa Sahayata Samuh v. State Of Chhattisgarh

2018-03-20Hon'Ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal2 pages

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR Writ Petition (C) No. 757 of 2018 Durga Swa Sahayata Samuh Gram Baseen, Development Block Simga, District Baloda Bazar Bhatapara Chhattisgarh. Through Its President Smt. Ishwari Verma, Wife Of Shri Chandrika Prasad Verma, Aged About 52 Years, Resident Of Gram Baseen, Post Suhela, Development Block Simga, District Baloda Bazar Bhatapara Chhattisgarh. ---- Petitioner

Versus

1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Department Of Women And Child Development, Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantralaya, Naya Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh.

2. Commissioner, Department Of Women And Child Development, Indravati Bhawan, Naya Raipur, Mandir Hasod, District Raipur Chhattisgarh.

3. District Collector, Collectorate, Baloda Bazar, District Baloda Bazar - Bhatapara Chhattisgarh.

4. District Programme Officer, Women And Child Development Department, Collectorate Compound, District Baloda Bazar - Bhatapara Chhattisgarh.

5. Child Development Project Officer, Integrated Child Development Project, Simga, District Baloda Bazaar Bhatapara Chhattisgarh. ---- Respondents For Petitioner :

Mr. Amrito Das, Advocate.

For Respondents/State :

Mr. Arun Sao, Dy. Adv. General.

Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal Order On Board 20/03/18 1.

Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would submit that by virtue of clause 11.3 of the amended instructions dated 05.06.2017, the petitioner is entitled to continue for the period of five years and then only the circular dated 05.06.2017 would apply but on the other hand, by order dated

01.02.2018, District Programme Officer has called for fresh application for supply of ready to eat food for his area i.e. Sector Ravan under the Simga area project.

2.

Be that as it may, the petitioner is at liberty to make representation before the District Programme Officer within a period of seven days from today bringing to his notice Clause 11.3 of the amended instructions dated 05.06.2017, which will be considered and decided within a further period of seven days from the date of receipt of such representation in accordance with law.

3.

With the aforesaid observations, the writ petition stands finally disposed of.

Sd/- (Sanjay K. Agrawal) Judge Priyanka