← Library
High Court Of ChhattisgarhMCRC/2087/2021allowed

Santram v. State Of Chhattisgarh

2021-03-22Hon'Ble Shri Justice Gautam Chourdiya2 pages

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR MCRC No. 2087 of 2021 1.

Santram S/o Dhaniram, Aged About 41 Years, R/o Village Nagedi, Thana Rajadevari, District Balodabazar (C.G.) 2.

Santosh Sahu S/o Amritlal Sahu, Aged About 30 Years, R/o Village Charoda(B) Outpost Baya, Thana Rajadevari, District Balodabazar (C.G.).

3.

Abhishek Shrivastav S/o Sanjay Shrivastav, Aged About 31 Years, R/o Ward No. 35 Birgaon, Thana Urla District Raipur (C.G.). ---- Applicants

Versus

1.

State Of Chhattisgarh, Through Station House Officer, Police Station Pithora, District Mahasamund (C.G.).

---- Non-applicant For Applicants : Mr. Vikash Pradhan, Advocate.

For Non-Applicant/State : Dr. (Ms.) Veena Nair, Dy. Advocate General. Hon'ble Justice Shri Gautam Chourdiya Order on Board 22/03/2021 1) Heard on admission.

2) The application is admitted for hearing.

3) With the consent of the parties, the matter is heard finally. 4) The applicants have preferred this First Bail Application under Section 439 of Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 as they are in jail since 02/03/2021 in connection with Crime No. 55/2021 registered at Police Station Pithora, District Mahasamund (C.G.) for the offence punishable under Section 34(2) of Chhattisgarh Excise Act.

5) Allegation against the applicants is that they were found in illegal possession of 50 bulk Ltrs. of country made liquor (Mahuwa). 6) Learned counsel for the applicants submit that the applicants are

innocent and have been falsely implicated in the case. The applicants were arrested on 02/03/2021. He also submits that the applicants have no criminal antecedents and conclusion of trial is likely to take some time for its disposal. Therefore, the applicants be released on bail by this Court.

7) On the other hand, learned counsel for the respondent/State opposes the bail application. However, she submits that the applicants have no criminal antecedents.

8) Having heard learned counsel for the parties, having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, considering the quantity of illicit liquor, the detention period of the applicants and the fact that the applicants have no criminal antecedents and there is no apprehension of the applicants tampering with the evidence or absconding as admitted by both the counsel and that conclusion of trial may take some time, the application is allowed. It is directed that in the event each of the applicants executing a personal bond for a sum of Rs. 1,00,000/- with two sureties of Rs. 50,000/- each to the satisfaction of the concerned Trial Court, they shall be released on bail on the following conditions:- i.

they shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such fact to the Court, ii.

they shall not act in any manner which will be prejudicial to fair and expeditious trial, and iii.

they shall appear before the trial Court on each and every date given to them by the said Court till disposal of the trial. iv.

they shall not involve themselves in any offence of similar nature in future.

-Sd/- (Gautam Chourdiya) Judge Chandrakant