Ku. Renu Soni v. State Of Chhattisgarh And ORS.
This judgment came from a scanned document and its text layer is unreliable — words may be garbled. Check the original PDF before relying on any passage.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATrISGARH AT BILASPUR
W.P. (S) No.
é69f3 / 2014 PETITION$&) / Ku.
Renu/sOm D/o Madan Prasad 6"
vp§¢éeéWJiTl h Soni Aged about years R/o Samari' P.SSamari Tehsil Kushami "w"
Distt- Balrampur- Ramanujganj (C.G)
VERSUS
'
RESPONDENTS 1'
State of Ch/Qtisgarh Through - The Secretary Department of Home Mahanadi Bhawan New Raipur Distt.- Raipur (C.G.) 2_ The Director General of police Chhattisgarh Police Headquarter Raipur lDistt.-{Raipur (C.G.) 3.
The Inspecgr General of police Surguja Range Ambikapur DisttSurguja I'(C.G.)V 4.
Superintendent of police Balrampur Distt:,Balrampur (C.G) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 22€/OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA
m asaitaaa - ' SB : Hon'ble Shri Manindrét Mohan Shrivastaya, J. 24-12-14 V A.N. Pandey, CoUnsel 'Or the petitioner/é.
S'h'ri'Y.S.Thakur,' Dy.A. 3. for the State. I: Through this petition, the petitioner'§e prayed for direction tov '
respondents.
to consider petitioner's application for grant of appropriate benefit including benefit of compassionate appointment under the scheme of rehabiiitation for those Who have been '
v affected by naxallte move ent It Is submitted that though the 'Supenntendent of Police specmed the petmoner as naxahte affected petitioner s applica ion is still pending conSIderation From the certifca 'of the Superintendent of police t Balrampur, prima faCIe, the claim of the petitioner does not appear to be frivolous 'and therefo requires consideration.
r its that petitioner's application would b Learned DyAG su be conSIdered in accordan e With the eXIsting scheme of grant oft '
benefit to naxahte affected erson ln View of the above his petition is disposed off With direction v to respondent No 3 to take i to conSIderation petitioner s application under Government s schem:
for rehabilitation of persons affected in naxalite operations. The defisiOn may be taken as early as possible l preferably within a period o three months from the date of receipt of r copy of this order.
.
Sd/- "
Manindra Mohan Shrivastava Deepti i Judge