← Library
High Court Of ChhattisgarhMCC/512/2016allowed

Atul Dubey v. State Of Chhattisgarh

2016-07-21Hon'Ble Shri Justice Pritinker Diwaker2 pages

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR MCC No. 512 of 2016 • Atul Dubey S/o Shri. V.N. Dubey, Aged About 41 Years OccupationDirector, Rekhankan Builders Pvt. Ltd. R/o- Shivayan Villa, Pratappur Nagar, Ambikapur, (Chhattisgarh), ---- Petitioner

Versus

• State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary Department Of Home, D.K.S Bhawan, Mantralaya, Raipur, • Director General Of Police, Phq, Raipur, (Chhattisgarh), • The Inspector General Of Police, Surguja Range, Ambikapur, DistrictSurguja, (Chhattisgarh), • The Superintendent Of Police, Ambikapur, District- Surguja, (Chhattisgarh), • The City Superintendent Of Police, Ambikapur, District- Surguja, (Chhattisgarh), • The Station House Officer, Police Station Ambikapur, District- Surguja, (Chhattisgarh), • The Central Bureau Of Investigation, Through Its Director, New Delhi, • The Registrar Of Companies, Sanjay Complex, A- Block, 3rd Floor, Jayendraganj, Gwalior, (Madhya Pradesh), • Tata Consultancy Services, Through Its Director, Madhapur, Hyderabad, (Andhra Pradesh), • K.N. Singh, S/o R.B.

Singh, Aged About 37 Years R/o- Kedarpur, Ambikapur, District- Surguja, (Chhattisgarh), • Smt. Shikha Singh, W/o Shri. K.N. Singh, Aged About 34 Years R/oKedarpur, Ambikapur, District- Surguja, (Chhattisgarh), ---- Respondents For Applicant : Shri Malay Shrivastava, Advocate For Respondent/State : Shri Shashank Thakur, G.A.

Hon'ble Shri Justice Pritinker Diwaker Order On Board 21/07/2016 Heard on I.A. No.01, application for condonation of delay in filing the M.C.C.

This is not opposed by the State counsel.

For the reasons mentioned in the application, the same is allowed. the delay in filing the M.C.C. is condoned. Also heard on M.C.C. No. 512/2016 application for restoration of W.P.(Cr.) No. 5368/2009 which was dismissed by this Court vide order dated 09.05.2016 on account of order being peremptory in nature. This is also not opposed by the State counsel. For the reasons mentioned in the application, the same is allowed and W.P.(Cr.) No. 5368/2009 is restored to its original number. Sd/- Pritinker Diwaker Judge suguna