Raju Dahariya v. State Of Chhattisgarh And ORS.

^7 n 7^^ ^*: ^^ w, THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR i43 OF 2014 Raju Dahariya aged about 28 years S/o Dauram Dahariya R/o Village Birgahani, Tahsii and Police Station Baloda, District JanjgeerChampa, Chhattisgarh.

VERSUS

!'^'

1. State of Chhattisgarh, through Secretary, Government of Chhattisgarh, Department of Home, Mahanad! Bhawan, Mantralaya, Neiv Raipur, Chhattisgarh *sf

2. Superintendent of Police, District JanjgeerChampa, Chhattisgarh. 3.

Collector, Chhattisgarh.

District Janjgeer-Champa,

4. State of Bihar, through Secretary, Government of Bihar, Department of Home, Mantralaya, Patna, Bihar.

i^ WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTtON_OF !NDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF A WRIT IN THE NATURE OF HABEUS

ORDER

OR ORDERS.

!- ^ss"

_-^he-

'i s '%:^ ^ ^ v HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR J^^ Coram: HON'BLEMR.T.P.SHARMA& HON'BLE MR.C.B.BAJPAI, JJ Writ Petition (HC) No.43 of 2014 Petitioner Raju Dahariya l/ersus Respondents 1.

State of Chhattisgarh 2.

Superintendent of Distt.Janjgeer-Champa Police, 3.

Cpllector, Distt.Janjgir-Champa ,rf :|.®fi;,tsS-l't;Stats^ofBihstrthraugh Secretary (Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitutionof India) Mr.l-okesh Singh, counsel for the petitioner. Mr.Satish Gupta, Govennment Advocate for respondents No.1 to 3/State.

f

ORDER

.^£(-1^-2-2015)

1. This is writ petition unagj!'::Artiele 226 of the Constitution of India in the nature of Habeas Corpus.; .

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that probably detenu have been returned to their home and he is not having any instructions.

3. In absence of any instructions and submission of learned counsel for the petitioner that detenu have returned to their home, the writ 'petition is dismissed.

Sd/- C.B.Bajpai Judge Sd/- T.P.Sharma Judfee '-^ ^