Ramashankar Lal v. State Of Chhattisgarh And ANR.

£w.- %*^.'£S'fes'^''

•^.^^^ ^--"'^

IN THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATniSffiftjE-t

AT BILASPUR W.P.(S)NO. ^'^'^/2014 PETITIONER Ramashankar Lal S/o Late Jangi r^[ Lal, aged about 67 years, Retd.

»fe,^^ Assistant Director, Education ^^t^.^;""^'\(k.-'"'rDePartment'

Chhattisgarh, ../••''^;,.t^'^"'\^'!"/^'"

presently residing at Nai Basti is^' .^Y Jalali Patti, P.0.

34, P.A.C.

Varanashi (U.P.) ..^w ^f- - .,.«&'

v'"°",

VERSUS

RESPONDENTS 1.

State of Chhattisgarh, Through, The Secretary Education Department, Mahanadi Bhavan, Mantralaya, New Raipur, DistrictRaipur (C.G.).

2.

District Education Officer, Korea, District - Korea (C.G.).

f'

WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE GONSTITUTION OF INDIA ^

;;XI-HC-78 35E( ^nqTcTO, OTllwx;, Ricii'yy VWvtt sh^i4)..Uj;f.C^.^.O..^;7.P..2....^ 201 ^ 3< 1^1 4111 ( ^qly<y ) sii^i^iiR-fi'* thl^frl4i-t ^ll»fcit^f^l</i <rjl<<!.(< ^isiRnsn^ii ^snw ;trf?a sn^i c 3ll^?b*t SB : Hon'ble Shri Manindra MAhan Shrivastava, J. 24.12.2014 Shri Lokesh Kumar Singtl , counsel for the petitioner.

for the Sfate, on advance Shri Mazid Ali, Panel Lawter copy.

Heard.

ttiis petition seekmg a direction The petitioner has filed claim for higher pay-scale in to respondents to consider his 28a April, 2008 (Annexure Paccordance with Circular dafecl 4).

petitictner had retired from service on It is found that the policy of the State Govt. was 31.12.2009 and before that, th promulgated on 28th April, 2C|08. Therefore, the petitioner's claim is required to be consider| sd.

;;

:/*i Accordingly, respondent 1|) lo.l is directed to eonsider and for- grant of time scale in deicide the petitioner's clairct accordance with circular of thl ; State Govt. dated 28.4.2008, wifhin a period of 3 months frcjm the date of receipt of copy of this order.

The petition is accordinglj finaUy disposed off.

c?u~/ Manindra Mohan Sl'rivastava E'raveen •s