High Court Of ChhattisgarhWPS/1747/2019disposed off

Sudiksha Gupta v. State Of Chhattisgarh

2019-03-12Hon'Ble Shri Justice P. Sam Koshy2 pages

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR Writ Petition (S) No. 1747 of 2019 Sudiksha Gupta W/o Vikas Gupta, Aged About 34 Years, Presently Posted As Lecturer (Panchayat), At Government Higher Secondary School Pondi (Mohda) Block Kota, District Bilaspur, R/o Baniyapara, Ratanpur, Block Kota, District Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh ---- Petitioner

Versus

1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through Its Secretary, Panchayat And Rural Development Department, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Naya Raipur, Raipur Chhattisgarh

2. Commissioner Cum Director, Directorate Of Panchayat, Naya Raipur, Raipur Chhattisgarh

3. Chief Executive Officer, Zila Panchayat, Bilaspur, District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh

4. Block Education Officer, Kota District Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh ---- Respondents For Petitioner :

Mr. Waquar Naiyer, Advocate For State :

Mr. P. Acharya, P. L.

Hon'ble Shri Justice P. Sam Koshy Order On Board 12.03.2019

1. The Petitioner is aggrieved by the action of the Respondents, whereby the petitioner has not been granted increment on the ground that she has not passed B.Ed/D. Ed examination.

2. Learned Counsel for the Petitioner submits that the issue with regard

to withdrawal/non-grant of increment on the ground of having not passed B.Ed/D.Ed examination was examined by this Court in the case of Jayant Kumar Patle v. State of Chhattisgarh (WPS No.4271 of 2017 and batch of petitions vide order dated 03.11.2017) and various directions have been issued for affording proper opportunity of hearing and then decide the matter.

3. Learned Counsel for the State submits that the Petitioner's claim would be examined after affording opportunity of hearing in terms of order dated 03.11.2017 passed in the case of Jayant Kumar Patle (supra).

4. Considering the aforesaid submission, this petition is finally disposed of with a direction to the Respondents for examination of Petitioner's claim in terms of order passed by this Court in the case of Jayant Kumar Patle (supra) and to take appropriate decision thereon subject to her completing the requisite length of service.

5. The writ petition accordingly stands disposed of. Sd/- P. Sam Koshy Judge Khatai