Smt.Priya Bajaj v. Municipal Corporation, Raipur
This judgment came from a scanned document and its text layer is unreliable — words may be garbled. Check the original PDF before relying on any passage.
WAWWWWW /'":'.l\_ wagm §mm§a ( w
IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR
C.G.
«2 C>é2 / W.P.(C} No ........................[2014 f f PETITIONER:;
Smt.
Priya Bajaj, W/o Shri Vijay Bajaj, Age years, R/o Katora Talab, Near Bank of Maharastra, P.S.
Civil Lines, Raipur, District Raipur(CG)
VERSUS
'M'unicipal Corporation Raipur (C.G.) Through the Commissioner, Town Building, Raipur (C.G.) PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF M INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF APPROPRIATE WRITS OF MANDAMUS AND CERTIORARI AND FOR OTHER SUITABLE WRITS AND DIRECTIONS:-
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR W.P. (C) No.2560 of 2014 PETITIONER Chainraj Baradiya
Versus
RESPONDENT Municipal Corporation Raipur AND W.P. 1C! No.2561 of 2014 PETITIONER Smt. Priya Bajaj
Versus
RESPONDENT Municipai Corporation Raipur Shri Jitendra Pali, counsel forthe petitioners. Shri Mateen Siddiqui, counsel for the respondentCorporation SINGLE BENCH :
HON'BLE SHRI PRASHANT KUMAR MISHRA, J.
ORAL ORDER (24/1 2/2014) Learned counsel for the respondent-Corporation would submit, on telephonic instruction from the Commissioner, that the petitioners would be shifted and allotted some other shop, subject to fulfillment of terms and conditions. He would also submit that it is not a case where only the petitioners are evicted but since the Corporation is going to construct a new stadium in the same place where the present stadium is located, all the shop-keepers who were given shop on rental basis are being evicted 2.
In view of the statement made by learned counsel for the respondent-Corporation, no further order is necessary because the petitioners have already been evicted.
3.
ln view of the above, writ petitions stand disposed of, Sd/'
'
Prashant Kumar Mishra Ashu Judge