← Library
High Court Of ChhattisgarhWPC/2308/2017disposed off

Smt. Gayatri Bai v. State Of Chhattisgarh

2017-08-28Hon'Ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal2 pages

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR WPC No. 2308 of 2017

1. Smt. Gayatri Bai Wd/o Late Shri Chandrika Prasad, Aged about 66 years Caste Kalar, R/o House No. 62, Mangaon, Police Station & Tahsil Katghora, Civil & Revenue District Korba, Chhattisgarh.

2. Dhanvendra Nath S/o Late Shri Chandrika Prasad, Aged about 46 years By Caste Kalar, R/o House No. 62, Mangaon, Police Station & Tahsil Katghora, Civil & Revenue District Korba, Chhattisgarh. ---- Petitioners

Versus

1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary Department of Revenue, Mahanadi Bhawan, Capital Complex, Mantralaya, Naya Raipur, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh.

2. The Collector, Korba, District Korba Chhattisgarh.

3. The Sub Divisional Officer (Revenue) Katghora, District Korba, Chhattisgarh.

4. The Director, South Eastern Coalfield Limited, Seepat Road, Bilaspur, District Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh.

5. The Managing Director, South Eastern Coalfield Limited, Kusmunda Colliery Area Korba, District Korba, Chhattisgarh.

---- Respondents For Petitioners :

Shri Sunil Sahu, Advocate.

For Respondents :

Shri Dhiraj Wankhede, G.A. for the State.

Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal Order On Board 28/08/17 Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner's land has been acquired by the South Eastern Coalfield Limited in lieu of which neither compensation has been given to the petitioners nor compassionate appointment has been granted to the petitioner's next of kin till date and, therefore, directions may be issued to the respondent authorities to consider and decide the same expeditiously.

2.

I have heard learned counsel for the petitioner. 3.

The prayer appears to be fair and reasonable and is accordingly allowed. 4.

Be that as it may, the respondent authorities- S.E.C.L. are directed to consider petitioner's application and take decision on the same expeditiously preferably within a period of three months from the date of receipt of copy of this order. The petitioners would be at liberty to make an additional representation for the redressal of their grievances.

5.

With the aforesaid observations, the writ petition stands finally disposed of. Sd/- (Sanjay K. Agrawal) Judge Priyanka