Satish Kumar v. Dwarika Prasad And ANR.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR.C.G

WRIT PETITION (227) N0. 9^3/2014 PETITIONER PLAINTIFF SATISH KUMAR, S/0 B.P LAHMOR, AGED ABOUT YEARS (NOW YEARS), CAST DHIVAR, R/0 NEW CHANDNIYA PARA JANJGIR, TAHSIL ^ ...--":'^ ..C^-V :^yp"'

\yJANJGIR, DISTRICT JANHGIR CHAMPA, C.G !

;

1:

r: • !

t^*"'

ft-3®•"'

VERSUS

RESPONDENTS DEFENDENTS 1,;''"'DWARIKA PRASAD, S/0 LATE MANGALI PRASAD GUPTA, AGED ABOUT YEARS (NOW 46 YEARS), R'/O MAIN ROAD BILHA, PRESENT ADDRESS: MAA NARMADA FERTILIZER COMPANY SHANICHRI BAZAR, BILASPUR, / DISTRICT BILASPUR, C.G 2.

STATE OF CHHATTISGARH, THROUGH COLLECTOR, BILASPUR, DISTRICT ' 1^1^^' fr 1 fte t BILASPUR, C.G WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 227 OF THE CONSTITUTIONOF INDIA

HIGH COURT OF CHHAmSGARH^BILASPUR W.P. (227) No. 953 of20U PETITIONER Satish Kumar .9Versus RESPONDENTS Dwarika Prasad & another.

Shri Yogesh Chandra, counsel for the petitioner. Shri Sunil Pillai, Panel Lawyer for the State. SINGLE BENCH :

HON'BLE SHRI PRASHANT KUMAR MISHRA, J.

ORAL ORDER (22/01/2015) Petitioner has challenged the legality and validity of order passed by the trial Court whereby he has been permjtted to abandon the suit. The order has been passed QFtan^aRplicafion moved by^the petitioner/plaintiff himself under0rdgr'231:?uiel ofCode ofCivil Procedure. 2.

1 k'ln view of the fact that petitioher has withdrawn the suit of his own, the Same amounts to a consent order whichcannot be challenged before any superior Court.

3.

This petition under Article 227ofthe Constitution is not maintainab;:;- It is accordingly dismissed.

^ --- Sd//- Prashant Kumar Mishra Judge ^ ~s / V-