← Library
High Court Of ChhattisgarhCONT/235/2019disposed off

M/S Patil Construction And Infrastructure Ltd. v. Shri Pandeshwar Sai

2019-09-03Hon'Ble The Chief Justice,Hon'Ble Shri Justice Parth Prateem Sahu2 pages

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR Cont No.235 of 2019 (Arising out of order dated 26.11.2018 passed by this Court in WP(C)- 2793 of 2018) M/s Patil Construction And Infrastructure Ltd. Having Its Office At 3rd Floor, Pmpml Commercial Building No. 01, Pune (Through Its Authorized Signatory, Shaliwan Chandrakant Surwase), District Pune Maharastra.

---- Petitioner

Versus

1. Shri Pandeshwar Sai Presently Posted As Superintending Engineer PWD Kanker Circle, Kanker Chhattisgarh.

2. Shri Rakesh Kumar Gaur Presently Posted As Executive Engineer, Bhanupratappur, District Kanker Chhattisgarh.

3. Shri R. B. Manglukar Presently Posted As Chief Engineer PWD, Bastar Zone, Jagdalpur Chhattisgarh.

-----Respondents --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- For Petitioner : Shri Sunil Otwani, Advocate.

For Respondents/Contemnors : Shri Harshwardhan Pargania, Advocate.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Hon'ble Shri PR Ramachandra Menon, Chief Justice & Hon'ble Shri Justice Parth Prateem Sahu Judgment on Board Per PR Ramachandra Menon, CJ 03.09.2019

1. This matter arises from the alleged non-compliance with the direction given by this Court as per the judgment dated 26.11.2018 in WP(C)- 2793/2018. When the matter came-up for consideration before this Court on the last occasion ie, on 16.02.2019, it was submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the issue could be resolved, if a joint inspection was ordered, which course was accepted from the part of the respondents as well. It was accordingly, that '26.08.2019' was fixed as the date for joint inspection, making it clear that parties shall be present on the spot at

10:00 am onwards, also making available all the relevant documents for conducting the inspection in a fruitful manner.

2. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that pursuant to the above order, the joint inspection has been conducted and that further proceedings are being pursued, under which circumstances, no further order is called for. It is stated that the matter can be closed accordingly.

3. In view of above, no further steps are necessary. Contempt matter stands closed.

Sd/- Sd/- (PR Ramachandra Menon) (Parth Prateem Sahu) Chief Justice Judge Pawan/Jamal