← Library
High Court Of ChhattisgarhWPS/6683/2010disposed off

Vijay Singh v. State Of Chhattisgarh And ORS.

2016-11-17Hon'Ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal2 pages

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR W.P. (S) No.

of 201 Vinay Singh, S/o Shiv Kumar, age about 36 years, R/o Ekta Chowk, Behind Marbal Line, Laxmi Nagar, Raipur (C.G.) ---- Petitioner

Versus

1. State Of Chhattisgarh, through its Secretary, Department of Cooperative, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.)

2. Registrar Cooperative Society, Pension Bada, Raipur (C.G.)

3. Collector, Ex-Officio, Chairman, Bhoramdev Cooperative Sugar Production Factory Ltd. Kawardha (C.G.)

4. Managing Director Bhoramde, Cooperative Sugar Production Factory Ltd. Kawardha (C.G.)

5. General Manager, Bhoramdev Cooperative Sugar Production Factory Ltd. Kawardha (C.G.) ---- Respondents For Petitioner :

Shri Ali Asgar, Advocate.

For Respondents No.1 & 2 :

Shri Dhiraj Kumar Wankhede, GA For Respondents No.3 to 5: Shri Akhilesh Kumar, Advocate. Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal Order On Board / 11 /201 Heard.

(1) Learned counsel appearing from the respondents No. 3 to 5 would submit that the petitioner has remedy to file application before the Registrar, Co-operative Societies under Section 55(2) & 77 of the Madhya Pradesh Co-operative Socieities Act, 1960 (for short 'Act, 1960') for resolving his dispute.

(2) In view of above, counsel for the petitioner would submit that he may be permitted to prefer application before the Registrar, Co-operative Societies under Section 55(2) & 77 of the Act, 1960 and the same may be directed to be decided expeditiously. To which, counsel for the respondents No. 3 to 5 has no objection.

(3) Be that as it may, if the petitioner prefers application before the Registrar, Co-operative Societies within a period of two weeks from today raising a dispute under Section 55(2) & 77 of the Act, 1960, the said Authority would consider and dispose of such an application/dispute within a period of three weeks after hearing both the parties on its own merits.

(4) With the aforesaid observations, the writ petition stands finally disposed of.

Sd/- (Sanjay K. Agrawal) Judge D/-