Raghunandan Patnaik v. The State Of C.G.And ORS.

a?"Ry

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR

[CHHATTTSGARHI W. P. NO. 1823 OF 2004 fEi'i'numEK Kagnunanaan PamalK, S/o.

Late Banshidhar Patnaik, Aged years, Occupation -Service, presently posted as Assistant Superintendent of .

v Police[Zonal], Special Branch Raipur [Chhattisgarh]

VERSUS

RESPONDENTS State of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, Home Department [Police], Mantralaya, Dau Kalyan Singh Bhawan, Raipur [CG] .

Director General of Police Chhattisgarh, Raipur [CG] 3.

Superintendent of Police Durg, District Durg {CG} "

X/ 9/ WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE. OF WRIT IN NATURE OF CERTIORARI MANDAMUS PROHIBITION AND U'I'ITEK SUI'I'ABLE WRI'I.' OR WRITS, DlmoN OR DIRECTIONS, ORDER OR ORDERS:

HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR SINGLE BENCH: HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SANJAY K. AGRAWAL WRIT PETITION NO. 1823 OF 2004 PETITIONER Raghunandan Patnaik

Versus

RESPONDENTS State of Chhattisgarh and others _IVIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUT (\R ION Verma, counsel for the petitioner.

ed with the adverse remarks in his 3/2001.

Against the adverse remarks, petitioner madeQWWtation vide Annexure-P/3 to the Director Generai of Police.

His representation against the adverse remarks in the ACR was not decided till date despite several reminders by the petitioner to the Director General 'of Police and this writ petition has been filed seeking quashment of adverse remarks in his ACR. _2.

Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that his ~~ 'c '§.

representation against the ACR has not been decided till date despite several reminders.

3.

Learned counsel for the State/respondents would submit that Frn '

', Sanjay K.Agrawali J / ,Judge Tlwari