Hitesh Sawaria v. Yogesh Kumar Tonk And Others

.T-, "

^s^p

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR

FIRST APPEAL N0.

_ \ L't <5 /2004 S1u /HITESH KUMAR SAVARIYA, SON OF LATE DAYALAL SAVARIYA, AGED ABOUT YEARS, RESIDENT OF APPELLANT NARAYAN BASTA BADA, FAFADIH, RAIPUR.

[Plaintiff] vs / l.YOGESH KUMAR TAUNK, SON OF ^ LATE DHANJIBHAI TAUNK, AGED ,(^y, ^.•^.••''

e'&^ / .** - ?'^'f.*'

ABOUT 45 YEARS, RESIDENT OF f LAKHOLI CHOWK, RAJNANDGAON [C.G.] ^^ ^^"

~.6"

..

.<~'^\.

r<^> y 2.ABDUL GAPFAR MANNA SON S OF UNKOWN, AGED ABOUT YEARS, RESIDENT OF BAIJNATH PARA, RAIPUR [C.G.] i.SMT.

HEMLATA GOEL, AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS WIFE OF SHRI RESPONDENTS ASHOK KUMAR GOEL, RESIDENT [Defendants] OF FAFADIH, RAIPUR.

<- Civil Suit valued at Ra.75,8007Court fee affixed Rs.8,920/; This appeal valued at Rs.75,800/- Court fee affixed Rs.8,920/- '>c APPEAL UNDER SECTION 96 OF THE CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE 1908

..iFi::

f < !i,- ;: !t 'il'lklBUi ,.

•i'^Sfiil ^i !';'E:»'iia':

s ,.j/ L»%^ HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR /^>) Order Sheet FA No. 140 of 2004 Hitesh Kumar Savariya Versus Yogesh Kumar Taunk and Others 12/08/2015 |None for the appellant.

IShri Mayank Chandrakar, counsel for the respondents. The matter was passed over once in absence of any representation on behalf of the appellant.

No one appears for the appellant even in the second call. In the circumstances, there is no other option left with the' court but to dismiss the FA for want of prosecution. Accordingly, FA is dismissed for want of prosecution. Sd/- Goutam Bhaduri Judge goun