← Library
High Court Of ChhattisgarhWPS/6425/2010disposed off

Rajesh Kumar Adile v. State Of Chhattisgarh And ORS.

2021-07-29Hon'Ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal2 pages

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR Writ Petition (S) No.6425 of 2010 Rajesh Kumar Adile, S/o Shri Basham Kumar Adile, aged about 47 years, currently working as Labour Inspector at office of Asstt. Labour Commissioner, Raigarh (C.G.) ---- Petitioner

Versus

1. State of Chhattisgarh, through its Secretary, Department of Labour Welfare, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.)

2. Labour Commissioner, Nirmal Chaya Bhawan, Meera Datar Road, Shankar Nagar, Raipur (C.G.)

3. Asstt. Labour Commissioner, Raigarh, Distt. Raigarh (C.G.) ---- Respondents ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ For Petitioner:

Mrs. Astha Shukla, Advocate.

For Respondents/State: Mr. Avinash Singh, Panel Lawyer. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal Order On Board 29/07/2021

1. Proceedings of this matter have been taken-up through video conferencing.

2. Mrs. Astha Shukla, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, would submit that the petitioner's representations dated 14-12-2004, 30-122004 and 19-4-2010 for seniority have been rejected by the State Government vide order dated 30-9-2010 (Annexure P-8) by a nonspeaking and unreasoned order by which he has suffered prejudice, therefore, he may be allowed to file fresh representation before the State Government.

3. The prayer is fair and reasonable.

4. The petitioner is permitted to file fresh representation before the State

Government qua seniority within three weeks from today and the State Government will decide the same by a speaking and reasoned order within 30 days from the date of receipt of the said representation without being prejudiced by order dated 30-9-2010 (Annexure P-8). This Court has not expressed any opinion on the merits of the matter.

5. With the aforesaid observation and direction, the writ petition stands finally disposed of. No order as to cost(s). Sd/- (Sanjay K. Agrawal) Judge Soma