← Library
High Court Of ChhattisgarhWPC/2489/2017disposed off

Gopal Prasad Soni v. State Of Chhattisgarh

2017-09-11Hon'Ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal2 pages

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR Writ Petition (C) No.2489 of 2017 1.

Gopal Prasad Soni S/o Late Ramsunder Soni, Aged About 48 Years R/o Mohalla Sattipara, Ambikapur, Police Station And Tahsil Ambikapur, District Surguja, Chhattisgarh. 2.

Smt. Sanju Soni W/o Gopal Prasad Soni, Aged About 40 Years R/o Mohalla Sattipara, Ambikapur, Police Station And Tahsil Ambikapur, District Surguja, Chhattisgarh.

---- Petitioners

Versus

1.

State Of Chhattisgarh Through : Secretary, Revenue Department, Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantralaya, Capital Complex, New Raipur, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh.

2.

Collector, Ambikapur, District Surguja, Chhattisgarh. 3.

Commissioner, Surguja Division, Surguja, Ambikapur, District Surguja, Chhattisgarh.

4.

Sub-Divisional Officer ( Revenue ), Ambikapur, District Surguja, Chhattisgarh.

5.

Tahsildar, Ambikapur, District Surguja, Chhattisgarh. 6.

Chhattisgarh Lok Ayog, Through : Its Secretary, Chhattisgarh Lok Ayog, Raipur, Gandhi Chowk, Raipur, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh.

--- Respondents For Petitioners : Mr. Manoj Paranjpe, Advocate For State : Mr. Shashank Thakur, Govt. Advocate Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal Order On Board 11/09/2017 (1) Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would submit that the learned Commissioner, Surguja by its order dated 29.08.2017 has refused to extend the stay order dated 07.01.2017 as extended on

27.03.2017 and 16.05.2017 and fixed the case for final hearing on 11.09.2017 and the letter dated 14.08.2017 has been issued to complete the entire exercise.

(2) Learned counsel for the State would support the impugned order and oppose the prayer made by the learned counsel for the petitioner. (3) I have heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the impugned order.

(4) Since the matter is fixed for final hearing on 11.09.2017 and stay order passed on 07.01.2017 was operating till 16.05.2017, therefore, in the interest of justice, it would be expedient to direct the Commissioner, Surguja to hear the matter and pass the final order on or before 30.09.2017. Till then, the stay order passed on 07.01.2017 shall remain in operation.

(5) With the aforesaid observation, the writ petition stands finally disposed of.

Sd/- (Sanjay K. Agrawal) Judge L/-