← Library
High Court Of ChhattisgarhWPS/3166/2016disposed off

Rameshwari Miri v. State Of Chhattisgarh

2016-07-26Hon'Ble Shri Justice Manindra Mohan Shrivastava2 pages

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR WPS No. 3166 of 2016 Rameshwari Miri W/o Heeralal Miri, Aged About 34 Years Occupation Service, R/o Sector Kanshinghi, Project Chhura, Distt. Gariyaband (Chhattisgarh) ---- Petitioner

Versus

1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Women And Child Development Department, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Naya Raipur, Distt. Raipur (Chhattisgarh)

2. Additional Secretary, Women And Child Development Department, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Naya Raipur, Distt. Raipur (Chhattisgarh)

3. Director, Women And Child Development Department, Directorate, Indravati Bhawan, Naya Raipur, Distt. Raipur (Chhattisgarh)

4. District Program Officer, Gariyaband, Distt. Gariyaband (Chhattisgarh) ---- Respondents Ms. Pritha Ghoshal, counsel for the petitioner/s. Shri Gary Mukhopadhyaya, Dy.G.A. for the State. Hon'ble Shri Justice Manindra Mohan Shrivastava Order On Board 26/07/2016 Heard.

The petitioner has filed this petition seeking a direction to respondents to post the petitioner to a place nearby the place of posting of her husband who is posted as Assistant Teacher at Basna, District - Mahasamund. 2.

It is found that the petitioner is presently posted as Supervisor under the department of Women and Child Development at Gariyaband which is stated to be about 200 kms away from the place of posting of her husband. 3.

The Government has come out with a policy of postings and transfers in which, there is a provision for consideration of posting of husband and wife together as far as possible, subject to administrative exigency.

4.

In view of above, it is observed that as and when occasion arises for shifting the petitioner from the present place of posting, the department shall also keep in mind the policy of the State Government of keeping the husband and wife together as far as possible, subject to administrative exigency. The respondents shall decide petitioner's representation as early as possible. 5.

With the aforesaid observation, the petition is finally disposed off. Sd/- (Manindra Mohan Shrivastava) Judge Deepti